Client Alerts & Insights
USMCA Joint Review 2026 – Public Comment Period Now Open
September 19, 2025
Authored By:
The United States is preparing for the 2026 joint review of the USMCA trade agreement. Domestic US parties may now offer comment and testimony on what is working for the trade deal and what may need improvement.
- The joint review process, mandated at the six-year anniversary of the USMCA’s implementation, requires the U.S., Mexico and Canada to formally assess the agreement’s performance and decide whether to extend its terms.
- This is a critical opportunity for businesses and industry groups to influence the future of North American trade rules. Failing to participate may mean missed opportunities to address operational challenges or advocate for beneficial changes.
- Company action items are to assess experiences under the USMCA to identify any compliance or operational issues and then consider submitting comments or requesting to testify before the deadline on November 3, 2025.
An opportunity for public comment and testimony on the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) is now available following a Federal Register Notice issued by the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”). Comments are due by November 3, 2025. The USTR is seeking this valuable public input as it prepares for scheduled joint review of the USMCA beginning on July 1, 2026 (“Joint Review”). The USTR, under direction of Congress, is focused on the operational experience under the USMCA and the trade agreement’s effectiveness in promoting economic integration among the North American trading block.
Implementation of the USMCA
The USMCA replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) on July 1, 2020. The Trump 45 Administration implemented the USMCA to improve upon NAFTA by balancing the rules underpinning duty-free preferential treatment for the three member states. Stricter rules of origin with higher regional content value thresholds and updated customs procedures were implemented as a result. At the time, those changes also included an increased customs de minimis threshold (from $200 to $800) for low-value imports. As drafted, the USMCA specifically includes procedures regarding the Joint Review. The U.S. implementation of the USMCA also includes procedural requirements leading up to the Joint Review.
USMCA Joint Review Process
The USMCA requires that the member states assess performance under the trade agreement and determine potential renewal actions. Joint Review is required under the USMCA at the six-year anniversary of its enactment. Functionally this means that each party’s government will confirm in writing their wish to extend the review period. If all parties agree then reviews will continue every six years. If any party does not agree then the USMCA must be reviewed annually until the parties again agree on an extended period for review or until the trade agreement expires in 2036.
U.S. Approach to Joint Review
The USTR was required to issue the Federal Register Notice announcing the Joint Review and provide an opportunity for public comment. Subsequently, the USTR will submit a report to Congress that includes an assessment of operational experiences under the USMCA and a clear recommendation regarding the U.S. position on whether to extend the agreement. The report to Congress will also detail any previous efforts to address concerns related to that position or recommendation. The USTR must submit the report at least 180 days prior to the Joint Review. Canada and Mexico also have their respective processes leading up to the Joint Review.
Points of Interest Solicited for Comment
The USTR is accepting public comment until November 3, 2025, on the following topics:
- Any aspect of the operation or implementation of the USMCA.
- Any issues of compliance with the agreement.
- Recommendations for specific actions that the USTR should propose ahead of the Joint Review to promote balanced trade, new market access and alignment on economic security with Mexico and Canada.
- Factors affecting the investment climate in North America and in the territories of each Party, as well as the effectiveness of the USMCA in promoting investment that strengthens U.S. competitiveness, productivity and technological leadership.
- Strategies for strengthening North American economic security and competitiveness, including collaborative work under the Competitiveness Committee and cooperation on issues related to the non-market policies and practices of other countries.
Submission Process and Testimony Requests
Interested parties can submit public comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal using the docket number USTR-2025-0004. The USTR will hold a public hearing on November 17, 2025, at 10 a.m. EST in Washington, D.C. Anyone wishing to testify must notify USTR in writing and provide a summary of their proposed testimony by November 3, 2025. Requests to appear may also include a prehearing submission. Post-hearing rebuttal comments may be submitted seven calendar days after the last day of the public hearing.
Benesch’s team advises and represents clients in USMCA compliance, customs counsel and enforcement defense, as well as cross-border North American supply chain operations. We are available to assist in developing comments and testimony for the Joint Review process.
Benesch client alerts and legal publications are available for you to receive by signing up HERE.
Jonathan R. Todd is Vice Chair of Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group. He can be reached at 216.363.4658 or jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Vanessa I. Gomez is a Managing Associate with Benesch. She can be reached by telephone at 216.363.4482 or at vgomez@beneschlaw.com.
Ashley C. Rice is an Associate with Benesch. She can be reached at 216.363.4528 or arice@beneschlaw.com.
Robert M. Naumoff is Of Counsel with Benesch. He can be reached by telephone at 614.223.9305 or at rnaumoff@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Where AI Regulation Stands Today Part 2: State Attorneys General as the Primary AI Enforcers
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.