Client Alerts & Insights
Worksite Enforcement Increasing Under Trump Administration
September 29, 2017
Authored By:
With President Trump’s focus on immigration enforcement, employers are seeing an uptick in the workplace audits being conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customers Enforcement (“ICE”). Employers can avoid big fines by developing a comprehensive I 9 compliance program, which should include training, self audits, and an investigation-day action plan. As a reminder, employers must promptly complete a form I 9 for each person they hire or be subject to criminal and civil sanctions. Monetary penalties for knowingly hiring and employing undocumented workers range from $375 to $16,000 per violation, with repeat offenders receiving penalties at the higher end. Penalties for technical violations, which include failing to properly complete a form I 9 range from $110 to $1,100 per violation.
To reduce and avoid such fines, employers should be conducting regular self audits. Self audits help identify deficiencies in the employer’s process and spot trends. Self audits also allow for corrective action and additional training. If you have not self audited your I 9’s recently, you should do so as soon as possible. Self audits should be completed annually and supervised by an attorney. That way, the entire process is conceivably protected. At Benesch, we offer a fixed fee program of $20 per I 9 for review, assessment, and recommended corrections to the form. But, whether you it yourself or as recommended with the assistance of an attorney, you should undertake the self audit as soon as possible if you have not done one recently. It is often too late when ICE comes knocking at your door.
If you have any questions, please contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
W. Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.
H. Alan Rothenbuecher at arothenbuecher@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4436.
Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.