Michael B. Silverstein
Senior Managing Associate
He / Him / His
Overview
Michael is many things: an obsessive nerd, a former theatre kid, and a genuine person. As a trial and appellate litigator, he brings all of this to the table in the world of high-stakes, bet-the-company litigation.
Obsessive Nerd: Michael homes in on what cases are truly about. Every case is an intellectual problem, and he lives it until it’s solved. This obsession lets him take cases that some might think are dead in the water and transform them into winners for his clients through unique arguments and tactics.
Michael has proved this time and time again in his career. He did it when winning a significant class-certification victory in a unique competitor-based false-advertising case seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. Michael crafted summary-judgment arguments on a rarely interpreted state statute that won the case on the eve of trial. And he’s used summary-judgment briefing to flip cases of alleged willful copyright infringement on their head to leverage favorable settlement.
Former Theatre Kid: Before becoming an attorney, Michael harbored hopes of working in theatre. He still bears the scars from those days in the form of a still-shattered thumbnail from breaking his thumb during a sword fight (ask him about it). But he takes these theatre skills and applies them to the standup components of advocacy.
Whether Michael is arguing in trial and appellate courts, or deposing witnesses and plaintiffs, he brings an engaging, atypical-for-a-lawyer energy to arguments and examinations. This style cuts out the legalese so that he can get down to brass tacks with the Court and the witnesses.
A Genuine Person: What separates Michael is not just his accomplishments, but his style and his values. The legal world is full of over-the-top, unnecessary formalism. He rejects these archaic notions as incompatible with the modern world and modern problems clients face.
Michael also lets this guide his values. He maintains an active pro bono practice. As a member of the Sixth Circuit’s CJA Panel, Michael represents individuals who cannot afford counsel in their criminal and habeas appeals. He has also authored amicus briefs in state Supreme Courts, one of which convinced the Ohio Supreme Court to rectify issues in its postconviction proceedings under constitutional standards.*
***
At bottom, Michael works tirelessly for his clients using all his unique skills to win.
*Matter completed prior to joining Benesch.
Experience
As special counsel to the Ohio Attorney General, and lead private counsel for Ohio University, won a complete defense victory for Ohio University in a case stemming from the death of a student at an off-campus property. Set statewide precedent regarding statutory duties, as well as wrongful death and negligence claims owed by schools and universities.
Defeated class certification and prevailed on Daubert arguments dismissing the opinions of class plaintiffs’ damages and consumer survey experts, successfully arguing on behalf of telehealth company that plaintiffs’ claims involved too many individualized questions regarding injury and damages, rendering class treatment inappropriate.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- summa cum laude
- Order of the Coif
- CALI Award for Highest Grade in Contracts, Legislation & Regulation, Constitutional Law, International Law, Legal Writing III, Civil Rights, and Criminal Procedure I
- Symposium Editor, Case Western Reserve Law Review, Volume 68
- cum laude
Clerkships and Bar Admissions
More
- Listed, Ohio Super Lawyers – Rising Stars, 2025
Related News & Insights
Early Evidence? Not in This Court!: Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Rules Govern Over State Law
In Berk v. Choy, the Supreme Court held that a Delaware state law that requires plaintiffs bringing medical malpractice claims to set forth evidence of the suit’s merits via an affidavit of merit early in the case was unenforceable in federal court. This case has significant implications for the growing tension over the applicability of state anti-SLAPP laws in federal court.
Not Quite Full of It: The Risk of “Shrinkflation” Lawsuits
Key Takeaways: As companies grapple with inflation, many are forced to reduce product volume while keeping prices and packaging the …
Using the Funnel—Folgers’ Decision Key To Avoiding Certified False-Advertising Classes
Key Takeaways: The Eighth Circuit clarified that even when a state’s false-advertising law does not require reliance, plaintiffs must still …
49 Benesch Attorneys Selected to 2025 Ohio Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
Benesch is pleased to announce that 16 attorneys have been selected by their legal community peers to the 2025 Ohio …