Client Alerts & Insights
Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center: ILLINOIS UPDATE – Emergency Childcare for Essential Workers
March 27, 2020
Authored By:
Following the recent closure of all childcare centers by the Illinois Governor’s Executive Order on March 20, 2020, the Governor’s Office of Early Childhood Development (“GOECD”), in partnership with Illinois Department of Human Services (“IDHS”) and the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (“IDCFS”) established a program that provides emergency childcare for essential workers during the healthcare emergency.
For more information on who is essential, please see the definition of essential workers found here.
While, it is advised that children stay home when possible, this program acknowledges that some essential workers still require childcare during this healthcare emergency and establishes guidelines for providing emergency childcare for licensed and license-exempt childcare homes and unlicensed childcare centers.
Childcare Homes
Licensed and license-exempt childcare homes can serve up to six children of essential workers. There is no additional application or registration required. Participating childcare homes must notify the Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) system that it will be providing emergency childcare services to connect providers with families that need care. Additionally, all background checks for childcare workers must be up-to-date. Interested childcare homes should contact grant providers if serving primarily low-income families and would require grant funds to support its operations.
Childcare Centers
Childcare Centers can serve up to 50 children per center with a maximum group size of 10 per classroom. To comply, childcare centers must complete an IDCFS Application for Child Care Facility License for operation of a Emergency Day Care Programs (“EDCP”) and submit it to Emergency.Daycare@illinois.gov. The EDCP license application can be accessed here. Childcare centers may also need to submit an updated IDCFS Authorization for Background Checks for Child Care, which can be accessed here. Childcare centers must notify the CCR&R system that it will be providing emergency childcare services. The CCR&R may be notified online here.
Licensed Emergency Day Programs will receive a recertification visit by the IDCFS 90 days following issuance of license and can be subject to visits by the Department during its hours of operation subject to the discretion of IDCFS.[1]
For more information, please contact a member of the Benesch Healthcare+ team.
Martha J. Sweterlitsch at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this Client Alert, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by the CDC and local officials.

[1] Quick Reference of Rules for Emergency Child Care Centers, https://www2.illinois.gov/sites/OECD/Documents/Quick%20Reference%20of%20Rules%20for%20Emergency%20Child%20Care%20Centers.pdf
Latest News
Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Estoppel Standard in Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a rigid rule that often blocked debtors from pursuing claims they failed to disclose in bankruptcy. Courts must now look at the full circumstances before deciding whether an omission was intentional or an honest mistake.
Federal Court Hands Major Win to Tissue Product Manufacturers – FDA’s HCT/P Classification Decision for Umbilical Cord–Derived Product CORDGRAFT Rejected
On March 18, 2026, Chief Judge Brian C. Wimes of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a significant decision overturning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) classification of Vitti Labs’ umbilical cord–derived product, CORDGRAFT.
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.