Client Alerts & Insights

Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center: Recovery Rebates Not Countable for Public Assistance Purposes

March 31, 2020

Authored By:

As has been widely publicized, the CARE Act includes a provision for one time payments, referred to as “recovery rebates”, of up to $1200 for some taxpayers and certain non-taxpayers. The amounts will vary depending upon marital status, number of children and annual income as determined by either a taxpayer’s 2018 or 2019 Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) as found on the taxpayer’s tax return. Persons who have not filed a tax return for either of those years and who are otherwise eligible may file a return to qualify. Recipients of these payments who are also recipients of, or applicants for, federally funded public assistance benefits such as Medicaid and SNAP ( Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) can receive these payments without fear of losing eligibility for their public assistance benefits. These rebate payments do not count as income or resources for a 12-month period in determining eligibility for, or the amount of assistance provided by, any federally funded public benefit program. In addition, these payments are not taxable. This is good news for the those on Medicaid benefits and for their providers.

For further information about the rebates and who qualifies, see the Congressional Research Service Report here.

If you have any questions regarding the content above, please contact a member of your Benesch team.

Martha J. Sweterlitsch at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.

Jessica N. Angney at jangney@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4620.

***

Please note that this information is current as of the date of this client bulletin, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by CDC and local officials.

Latest News

Client Alerts & Insights 6.3.26

Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers

Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.

Client Alerts & Insights 6.3.26

Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026

Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …

Client Alerts & Insights 5.29.26

SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers

On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.

Client Alerts & Insights 5.29.26

Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns

State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.

View news and insights