Client Alerts & Insights
Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center: Recovery Rebates Not Countable for Public Assistance Purposes
March 31, 2020
Authored By:
As has been widely publicized, the CARE Act includes a provision for one time payments, referred to as “recovery rebates”, of up to $1200 for some taxpayers and certain non-taxpayers. The amounts will vary depending upon marital status, number of children and annual income as determined by either a taxpayer’s 2018 or 2019 Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) as found on the taxpayer’s tax return. Persons who have not filed a tax return for either of those years and who are otherwise eligible may file a return to qualify. Recipients of these payments who are also recipients of, or applicants for, federally funded public assistance benefits such as Medicaid and SNAP ( Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) can receive these payments without fear of losing eligibility for their public assistance benefits. These rebate payments do not count as income or resources for a 12-month period in determining eligibility for, or the amount of assistance provided by, any federally funded public benefit program. In addition, these payments are not taxable. This is good news for the those on Medicaid benefits and for their providers.
For further information about the rebates and who qualifies, see the Congressional Research Service Report here.
If you have any questions regarding the content above, please contact a member of your Benesch team.
Martha J. Sweterlitsch at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.
Jessica N. Angney at jangney@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4620.
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this client bulletin, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by CDC and local officials.

Latest News
Judicial Green Light: Court Upholds NLRB’s Cemex Decision
On April 21st, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC., reinforcing a significant shift in federal labor law governing union recognition and employer conduct during organizing campaigns.
The LEAD Model—Kidney Care’s Value-Based Care Journey LEADs Here
The new LEAD Model, launching in 2027, is CMS’s next-generation value-based care framework for kidney care, integrating CKD and ESRD patients into standard ACOs with a 10-year benchmark period, new payment options and greater flexibility for nephrology-led organizations.
DOL Proposes Universal Guidance Meant to Simplify Joint Employer Analysis
On April 22, 2026, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division proposed a new rule to clarify joint employer status and the related analysis under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Protection Act (“MSAPA”).
Only the Strong Survive: Easy Pitfalls to Avoid as a Defamation Plaintiff
Filing a defamation lawsuit is one thing. Surviving the inevitable motion to dismiss is another. A recent case out of the Eastern District of North Carolina, McKnight v. FOXY/WFXC/K 107.1/104.3 Radio Station, et al., Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-102, provides a useful case study in the kinds of missteps that can doom a defamation complaint before it ever reaches discovery.