Client Alerts & Insights
Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center: SBA Affiliation Rules May Complicate CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program Loan Eligibility for Certain Physicians and Group Practices
April 2, 2020
Authored By:
As many health care providers consider applying for CARES Act Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans under SBA Section 7(a), we would like these providers to be mindful of SBA’s “affiliation rules.” These rules may require borrowers, in certain circumstances, to aggregate their employee count with the employee count of their joint venture partner (or a joint venture partner’s parent company(ies)) to determine a borrower’s eligibility for PPP loans (e.g., the simplest test is that a borrower must have 500 or less employees).
More particularly, a question has arisen whether a physician or group practice applying for PPP loans under SBA Section 7(a), and which has one or more direct or indirect joint venture interests (e.g., joint ventures with dialysis organizations, surgery center companies or health systems, among others) may be required to aggregate all of a joint venture’s (and possibly its joint venture partner’s direct or indirect employees) for purposes of determining PPP loan eligibility. The rules regarding this issue are complicated and evolving due to the speed with which legislation has passed and guidance is being issued. We are aware that congressional lobbying efforts are under way in an effort to remove the affiliation rules for PPP loans. Benesch attorneys are tracking this potential issue and will follow up as additional guidance becomes available. In the meantime, it is important to understand the facts and circumstances related to each joint venture arrangement to evaluate whether this issue may apply.
Borrowers should be aware of these rules and appropriately disclose their relationships and affiliations in the SBA loan application. To guard against the business risk of PPP loan ineligibility, however, many providers are also attempting to increase capacity under existing lines of credit, apply for Emergency Injury Disaster loans (EIDL) and are working with their advisors to take advantage of tax relief offered under the CARES Act and CMS’s expansion of the Accelerated and Advance Payments Program.
Please reach out to one of the authors below if you have questions about the information contained in this Client Alert.
Jason S. Greis at jgreis@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6412.
Scott P. Downing at sdowning@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6326.
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this Client Alert, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by the CDC and local officials.

Latest News
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.
Chameleon Carriers—FMCSA’s “Reincarnated” Rule and Enforcement
As the U.S. DOT and its FMCSA ramp up certain elements of domestic enforcement, regulators are utilizing existing laws and regulations that previously were not often invoked. Enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement is one great example.
What’s Old Is New Again: Broker Liability Insulation from the Case Law in the Post-Montgomery Era
The Supreme Court has spoken in its Montgomery v. Caribe Transport decision, and the brokerage sector, and even shipper and motor carriers, are working toward adapting to this “new liability regime.”