Client Alerts & Insights
Department of Labor Officially Withdraws Trump-Era Independent Contractor Final Rule
May 10, 2021
Authored By:
On May 5, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor withdrew the pro-business Independent Contractor Final Rule published in the final days of President Trump’s administration. This withdrawal follows the Department of Labor’s previous actions signaling a shifting stance on contractor-related matters including the proposed delay of implementation of the Final Rule and notice and comment period. The notice and comment period for the proposed withdrawal closed on April 12, 2021. On May 5, 2021, the Department of Labor announced that the rule would be withdrawn effective May 6, 2021.
Under the now-withdrawn Final Rule, employers would have been able to use the “economic reality” test by applying two core factors, and three other “guideposts” to determine status. Under the two core factors, the Department of Labor would have considered: (1) the nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. These factors were intended to “carry greater weight in the analysis than any other,” according to the Department’s publications prior to the withdrawal of the Final Rule. If the two factors conflicted, employers then would have considered three other “guidepost” factors, which would have assessed: (3) the amount of skill required for the work, (4) the degree of permanence in the working relationship, and (5) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production.
According to the Biden administration’s Department of Labor, the now-withdrawn Final Rule was inconsistent with the FLSA’s purpose and text as well as existing judicial precedent. Also, the Department of Labor expressed concern that the prioritization of the two core factors would have undermined the longstanding “economic realities” test under which courts and agencies review a totality of the circumstances. The Department of Labor further acknowledged its concern that the Final Rule would have resulted in workers losing FLSA protections.
For the time being, the Department of Labor has not yet proposed a new independent contractor classification rule. Judicial precedent and Department of Labor regulations and guidance that were in place prior to the Final Rule’s publication continue to apply. The Department of Labor will consider the “economic realities” test to be the governing standard. In the economic realities test, a factfinder considers the following six factors as relevant to the analysis of whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor:
- the extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business;
- the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill;
- the extent of the relative investments of the employer and the worker;
- whether the work performed requires special skills and initiative;
- the permanency of the relationship; and
- the degree of control exercised or retained by the employer.
As employers should already have developed classification practices based on the preexisting economic realities test or more stringent state laws, this withdrawal does not create any new laws or rules with which employers must comply and accordingly modify practices. However, employers that have not already analyzed their contractor classification practices should do so, as the Biden administration has made clear that the expansion of protections for employees will be part of the administration’s agenda. Benesch is continuing to monitor further developments and will provide future alerts as the Biden administration’s Department of Labor continues to develop its stance on the proper classification of workers as independent contractors.
For more information on this topic, contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment practice group.
Corey Clay at CClay@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4158.
Adam Primm at APrimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Jordan J. Call at JCall@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6169.
Latest News
FTC Enforcement Trends in 2026: What Businesses, Advertisers Should Be Watching Now
Regulators continue to signal a return to core consumer‑friendly principles through new rulemaking initiatives, and recent enforcement activity, warning letters, and public commentary offer a practical preview of where scrutiny is likely to concentrate in 2026…
IEEPA Tariffs – Top Five Q&A for Supply Chains after U.S. Supreme Court Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision regarding tariffs Friday. The Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs according to the 6-3 decision…
Watch Your T&Cs! When Done Right, Terms and Conditions are Both Viable—And Valuable
The era of the paper/hard copy bill of lading and/or rate confirmation is fading fast. Hard copies and paper do live on in various shipment schematics; however, increasingly, and at a very rapid rate, transactions between shippers, carriers, brokers and forwarders are conducted by, and memorialized in, electronic form via email, interactive website access and response, and—more and more—AI mechanisms.
The Long Tail of the Opioid Crisis: How AGs Continue to Pursue Manufacturers, Distributors, Pharmacies
The opioid crisis has been a perennial priority for state attorneys general, and was the marquis priority for the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) in both 2023 (under OH AG Dave Yost) and 2025 (under NH AG John Formella). Recently, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the conclusion of a multistate effort to secure the bankruptcy reorganization plan for Purdue Pharma (Purdue).