Client Alerts & Insights
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Temporarily Stays OSHA’s Vaccine Rule
November 8, 2021
Authored By:
On November 6, 2021, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted an emergency motion to stay OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (the “ETS”) regarding vaccines and testing for employers with at least 100 employees (see our summary of the ETS here). The motion was filed by more than two dozen companies and the states of Texas, Louisiana, Utah, and South Carolina. The stay is temporary, pending further judicial review. OSHA has been directed by the Fifth Circuit to file its opposition to the petitioners’ motion for a permanent injunction by 5:00 P.M. on Monday, November 8.
What Does This Mean? Until further court action, enforcement of the ETS is stayed. However, the Fifth Circuit’s stay is temporary and can be lifted—the Fifth Circuit has not made a decision on whether or not the challenge to the ETS has merit. Further, the earliest the ETS requires compliance with any of its provisions is December 5, 2021, and employees have until January 4, 2021 to be vaccinated or begin regular testing, meaning that the stay has no immediate practical effect.
What Happens Next? The Fifth Circuit is one of 13 appellate courts that sit below the Supreme Court. On the date that the ETS was published, challenges were filed in 4 different circuits by separate coalitions of states. In addition to the Fifth Circuit challenge, actions have been filed in the Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits. The Fifth Circuit was the first to issue a stay. The rules of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation provide for a lottery to determine which circuit hears the merits of a challenge to a federal agency decision when challenges are filed in multiple circuits. Challenges filed within 10 days of OSHA’s publication of the ETS are included in the lottery. All challenges will be consolidated and heard in the circuit selected by the lottery. The circuit selected—if not the Fifth—can lift the Fifth Circuit’s stay. And, of course, decisions of the courts of appeals may be reviewed—and reversed—by the Supreme Court.
What Should Employers Do Now? Challenges to the ETS were expected, and the Fifth Circuit has become the first court to take action. However, this is far from the last word in litigation over the enforceability of the ETS. Employers should closely monitor for future developments and continue reasonable contingency planning should the ETS ultimately survive challenge.
Please reach out to Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group for more information.
Corey Clay at cclay@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6196.
Johanna Fabrizio Parker at jparker@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4585.
Latest News
Brown-Forman Decision Rolls Back NLRB’s Pro-Union Cemex Policy
In a blow to agency rulemaking and pro-union National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) policy, on March 6, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismantled the Biden-era NLRB decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC.
2026 Proposed Amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines—Key Changes for Economic Crimes
The United States Sentencing Commission (the “Commission”) published its proposed 2026 amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in two phases—in December 2025 and January 2026—with a period for public comment through February 10, 2026, and March 18, 2026, respectively.
Dance Like No One is Watching, Text Like Your Words Will Be Published on the Front Page: The Importance of Internal Compliance with FINRA and Text Message Production
Earlier this month, Benjamin Edwards, a broker-dealer firm, agreed to a censure and to pay a $750,000 fine for failing to properly supervise and preserve its employees’ business-related text messages.
Increased Medicare Enforcement Forthcoming? Minnesota Legislature, Attorney General Propose Expanded Charging Authority, Higher Penalties
On February 25, 2026, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, together with bipartisan legislative sponsors, introduced the 2026 Medical Assistance Protection Act (“MAP”), a sweeping proposal that would materially expand the state’s Medicaid fraud enforcement framework.