Client Alerts & Insights
Reciprocal Tariff Q&A – What the “Pause” Means for Supply Chains
April 10, 2025
Authored By:
Today the White House released written details for its modification of the “Reciprocal Tariff” program originally announced on April 2, 2025. This most recent Executive Order (the “E.O.”) issued on April 10, 2025, provides that imports from China, Hong Kong, and Macau are subject to additional 125% reciprocal tariffs while imports from most other nations are now subject to additional 10% universal tariffs. This modification also changes certain de minimis and low value postal shipments. High-impact questions and answers are shown below.
What Happens to Reciprocal Duties on Countries Other Than China?
The universal 10% duty applies to imported goods with origins from most (but not all) countries other than China, Hong Kong, and Macau. This essentially applies the baseline universal tariff to the countries that were slated to receive higher reciprocal tariffs. The effective date is April 10, 2025, and the “suspension” will continue for 90 days until July 9, 2025. This 10% duty burden is in addition to all other applicable tariffs. For many importers there will be a cumulative effect yielding higher total duties beyond 10%, including ordinary duties that would otherwise apply. Also, carve-outs of imported goods subject to certain other tariff programs were expressly provided in the tariff announced under E.O. 14257 on April 2, 2025. Those carve-outs remain unchanged.
What Happens to Reciprocal Duties on China and the PRC Region?
A reciprocal 125% duty applies to imported goods with origins in China, Hong Kong, or Macau. This rate increased in response to retaliation by China (the United States first issued at 34%, then raised to 84%, and now raises to 125%). The effective date is April 10, 2025. This 125% duty burden is effective in addition to all other applicable tariffs. As with the universal tariffs, there can be a cumulative effect yielding higher total duties.
What Happens to De Minimis and Low Value Postal Shipments?
De minimis imports from most countries remain unchanged by today’s EO. Additional duties on de minimis imports from China, Hong, Kong, and Macau have increased. De minimis imports are now subject to additional duties of 120% (the United States first issued at 30%, then raised to 90%, and now raises to 120%). The E.O. also increases the per-item additional duties applicable to low value postal shipments from $75 to $100 effective May 2, 2025, and continuing until June 1, 2025. An additional increase is planned for June 1, 2025, which will raise the per-item duty to $200 on postal items.
Reciprocal tariffs were originally announced in full detail on April 2, 2025. Our team’s original client on the tangible impact for supply chains and what to do in response is available HERE. Benesch client alerts and legal publications are available for you to receive by signing up HERE. We are responsive and available to assist with your company’s supply chain management challenges.
Jonathan R. Todd is Vice Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice Group at Benesch Law. He may be reached by telephone at 1-216-363-4658 or by e-mail at jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Megan K. MacCallum is an Associate with Benesch Law. She may be reached by telephone at 1-216-363-4185 or by e-mail at mmaccallum@beneschlaw.com.
Vanessa I. Gomez is an Associate with Benesch Law. She may be reached by telephone at 1-216-363-4482 or by e-mail at vgomez@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.