Client Alerts & Insights
Are You Prepared for the End of the COVID-19 Form I-9 Flexibilities?
May 23, 2023
Authored By:
The Form I-9 flexibilities implemented during the COVID-19 Pandemic that permitted employers to virtually review Section 1 and inspect documents establishing identity and authorization to work are ending on July 31, 2023. After that date, employers have a grace period until August 30, 2023, to complete physical inspection of documents that had been virtually inspected during the pandemic.
Even during the Pandemic, once remote employees had physically returned to work on a regular, consistent, or predictable basis, employers were required to physically inspect, within three (3) business days, original documents establishing identity and authorization to work. Employers who were not compliant with this practice as regular operations resumed, should take steps now to complete physical examination of these documents.
It is also important to document every effort made to comply with Form I-9 requirements during the Pandemic. Employers should be diligent in documenting all Covid-19 Pandemic protocols taken in the workplace, including dates when any physical distancing protocols were first implemented and documenting any reduced operations or workplace closures. The “Additional Information” part of Section 2 in the Form I-9 should be updated to include information about any initial or re-verification completed during the Pandemic and the date of any subsequent physical inspection. DHS recommends that employers list “COVID-19” in Section 2 as the reason for any physical inspection delay.
This is also an opportunity for employers to ensure that they have a comprehensive Human Resources policy in place to address discrepancies between remote document inspections and subsequently physical inspections. In addition, conducting an internal audit of Form I-9s, and related policies and procedures with counsel, is highly recommended.
Finally, in the event that DHS implements a permanent virtual inspection option, employers should ensure that audit trail requirements for electronic Form I-9s are compliant and capture when an electronic Form I-9 was created, completed, modified, altered, or corrected—and information about the date and time of access, the name of person accessing the Form I-9 (including having an individual pin for each person accessing the Form I-9), and the reason for access and/or what action was taken during the access.
For further assistance, please contact Margarita Krncevic or any member of Benesch’s Immigration Team. Margarita is a skilled immigration and employment attorney with prior in-house counsel experience. She has been a member of Employment Verification and Documentation Committees as well as a presenter on Employer Compliance Issues. She was named a Notable Immigrant Leader by Crain’s Cleveland in 2020, and is a native Spanish speaker.
Margarita can be reached at mkrncevic@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6285.
Latest News
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.
Managing Risk When Terminating Vendor Relationships
Terminating a vendor relationship is not as simple as stopping performance. Companies should carefully follow the contract’s termination provisions, including notice requirements, cure periods and other procedural obligations. Failure to do so can create breach-of-contract claims even when vendor performance issues exist.
Is Your PFAS Coverage at Risk? An Ohio Federal Court Ruling Opens the Door to Broader Insurer Denials
The federal holding in Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., the first of its kind, could reshape how insurers respond to PFAS-related coverage demands. Fire-Dex, a manufacturer of firefighter turnout gear, was sued by firefighters who alleged that exposure to PFAS from the gear caused cancer.