Client Alerts & Insights
Biden Administration Requires Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects
February 8, 2022
Authored By:
On February 4, 2022, President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order (“EO”) requiring project labor agreements (each a “PLA”) with unions on all federal construction projects valued at $35 million or more (defined in the EO as “Large-scale construction projects”).
The EO mandates that federal agencies awarding large-scale construction projects or obligating funds pursuant to such a contract require every contractor or subcontractor engaged on the project to agree to negotiate or become a party to a PLA. A PLA is a binding, pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project. The PLA requirement established by the EO is intended to assist the efficient and timely completion of large-scale construction projects by providing the various employers on a project with a single set of terms and conditions of employment, including a single dispute resolution mechanism.
Any PLA reached pursuant to the EO must:
- bind all contractors and subcontractors on the construction project through the inclusion of appropriate specifications in all relevant solicitation provisions and contract documents;
- allow all contractors and subcontractors on the construction project to compete for contracts and subcontracts without regard to whether they are otherwise parties to collective bargaining agreements;
- contain guarantees against strikes, lockouts, and similar job disruptions;
- set forth effective, prompt, and mutually binding procedures for resolving labor disputes arising during the term of the project labor agreement;
- provide other mechanisms for labor-management cooperation on matters of mutual interest and concern, including productivity, quality of work, safety, and health; and
- fully conform to all statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, and Presidential Memoranda.
The EO also allows for exceptions from the PLA requirement, where a senior official, no later than the solicitation date of the contract, provides a specific written explanation of why at least one of the following circumstances exist with respect to the contract:
- Requiring a PLA on the project would not advance the federal government’s interests in achieving economy and efficiency in federal procurement. Such a finding shall be based on the following factors:
- The project is of short duration and lacks operational complexity;
- The project will involve only one craft or trade;
- The project will involve specialized construction work that is available from only a limited number of contractors or subcontractors;
- The agency’s need for the project is of such an unusual and compelling urgency that a project labor agreement would be impracticable; or
- The project implicates other similar factors deemed appropriate in regulations or guidance issued pursuant to section 8 of this order.
- Based on an inclusive market analysis, requiring a PLA on the project would substantially reduce the number of potential bidders so as to frustrate full and open competition.
- Requiring a PLA on the project would otherwise be inconsistent with statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, or Presidential Memoranda.
The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”) has been tasked with creating related regulations within 120 days, after which point the use of PLAs with unions on all large-scale federal construction projects will be mandatory. Between the date of this order and the 120 days prior to the issuance of the final regulations by the FAR Council, federal agencies are “strongly encouraged” but not obligated to comply with the requisites of the EO.
The EO will apply only to directly financed federal construction projects, not projects funded by federal grants but carried out by other entities. This is notable, as the latter category will make up the majority of the projects funded under the recent $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
W. Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.
Corey Clay at cclay@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4158.
Adam Primm at aprimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Christopher W. Pendleton at cpendleton@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6219.
Latest News
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.