Client Alerts & Insights
Developments in AI Restrictions in the Workplace
October 23, 2024
Authored By:
Beginning January 1, 2026, Illinois employers must notify workers when using artificial intelligence (“AI”) to make employment-related decisions and could face regulatory enforcement and civil lawsuits if the deployment of AI results in discriminatory actions.
Signed by Governor Pritzker, House Bill 3733 amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to specifically prohibit employers from using AI to discriminate in the recruitment, hiring, promotion, training, discipline, tenure, and discharge of workers. This may happen in a number of ways, including using an applicant’s zip code to screen for jobs as a way to preclude residents of predominately minority neighborhoods or emphasizing certain schools over others.
The amendment defines AI as a “machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments.”
The move by Illinois follows a national trend set earlier this year by the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”), which issued guidance on employers’ use of AI and other automated systems in the workplace. The guidance outlines employment compliance issues that employers may face when using these advanced technologies, and urges employers to understand the design, programming, and training that drive an AI tool’s algorithm.
Otherwise, DOL warned, reliance on AI, absent human oversight, can put employers at risk of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and Equal Employment Opportunity laws. For example, systems that automatically deduct meal breaks from an employee’s compensable work hours may result in an FLSA violation if the employee is not completely relieved from duty. Employers that use AI or other technologies to calculate wage rates are responsible for ensuring that employees are paid in accordance with federal minimum wage and overtime, even when wage rates vary substantially.
Although AI may increase efficiency and productivity in employment decisions, DOL concluded that such systems may also perpetuate unlawful bias and automate unlawful discrimination.
In light of the DOL’s guidance, Colorado became the first state to pass a comprehensive act addressing AI-imposed bias. The law includes a notice-and-appeal provision which imposes an affirmative requirement on employers to provide detailed notices to applicants who are negatively affected by an AI-assisted decision. In addition, Colorado job applicants can challenge a company’s decision not to hire them. The law will take effect in February 2026.
We anticipate DOL and states like Illinois will issue best practice guidelines for employer implementation and use of AI. In the meantime, employers using AI systems should establish internal procedures to ensure compliance with state and federal labor standards.
For more information, contact a member of Benesch’s Labor and Employment Practice Group and continue to follow Benesch’s AI Commission as we address the evolving regulatory landscape of AI, impacts of new regulations, and steps toward compliance.
Kristopher J. Chandler at kchandler@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9377.
Rick Hepp at rhepp@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4657.
Alyson Waite at awaite@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4414
Latest News
Word on the Street: Key Insights from the 2026 National Association of Attorneys General Presidential Summit
The 2026 NAAG Presidential Initiative Summit highlighted the issues currently top of mind for state attorneys general, including consumer protection, affordability, healthcare, data privacy, artificial intelligence and antitrust enforcement.
SCOTUS Rules That States May Limit Women’s and Girls’ Sports to Biological Females – Another Chapter in the Delicate Legislative Balance Between Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause
Key Takeaways I. Background and Procedural History The Supreme Court consolidated two cases challenging state laws that restrict participation in …
Is Florida the New Hot Jurisdiction for Defamation Cases?
Florida is emerging as a favorable venue for defamation lawsuits because its long-arm statute makes it easier to bring out-of-state publishers into court—but plaintiffs still must clear the same substantive legal hurdles once the case gets there.
Forced Labor Tariffs – Public Comments Due Next Week for USTR Section 301 Investigation
US importers have the opportunity to submit public comment on proposed tariffs that will utilize Section 301 as a means of addressing forced labor in global supply chains. Comments are due to the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) by July 6, 2026.