Client Alerts & Insights
EEOC Shakeups Under the Trump Administration Targeting Gender Identity, Abortion Accommodations, and AI Bias
February 21, 2025
Authored By:
The Trump Administration has issued swift changes in policy, and the effects are now reaching the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). While the EEOC is still awaiting quorum to vote on major actions, it is signaling changes to Biden-era rules related to gender identity, abortion accommodations, and artificial intelligence (“AI”) bias risks.
LGBTQ+ Guidance
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order recognizing only “two sexes” and seeking rescission of the 2024 anti-harassment guidance. The Biden-era guidance, which is still in effect, provides that employers are prohibited from misgendering employees or barring them from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity.
Following President Trump’s order, EEOC Acting Chair, Andrea Lucas, directed that all impacted EEOC charges be elevated for review at the Commission’s headquarters. The EEOC has now filed motions to dismiss at least six transgender discrimination cases, which were based on allegations of inappropriate comments related to gender identity and misgendering employees. In addition, the Commission has removed nonbinary gender markers from bias charge intake forms. Lucas has signaled that once quorum is met, the Commission will be rescinding the 2024 anti-harassment guidance.
Abortion Accommodation Rules
The EEOC’s 2024 rules related to the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) require employers to provide accommodations for pregnant workers, including abortion-related accommodations. The rules were quickly challenged by the attorneys general of 17 states, who argued that the rules were illegal because abortions are not explicitly mentioned in the PWFA. In June 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas rejected a preliminary injunction brought by the states and held that they lacked standing to bring suit. Yesterday, the Eighth Circuit found that the states do have standing to bring the case and remanded, allowing litigation to proceed.
The EEOC has signaled that it will be dropping the Biden-era interpretation of the PWFA, as Lucas, who voted against the current PWFA rules, has stated that they conflate “pregnancy and childbirth accommodations with accommodations related to the female sex, that is, female biology and reproduction.”
AI Bias Guidance
In May 2023, the EEOC issued a technical assistance document outlining how AI algorithms in employment-related tools and programs may violate Title VII protections against bias toward job applicants and employees. The guidance provided employers with information on how to prevent this type of discrimination. The EEOC has since removed the guidance from its website, indicating that AI bias is not a topic of concern for the Trump Administration.
These changes to the EEOC rules and guidance showcase the Trump Administration’s policy priorities and directly impact how private sector employers will handle day-to-day issues surrounding employee gender identity and accommodations. While changes may be underway, employers are still subject to the Biden-era EEOC rules and guidance. They will remain subject to Title VII’s anti-discrimination protections for applicants and employees.
Eric Baisden is a Partner and Co-Chair of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. He can be reached at 216.363.4676 or ebaisden@beneschlaw.com.
Adam Primm is a Partner of the Labor & Employment Practice Group. He can be reached at 216.363.4451 or aprimm@beneschlaw.com.
Grace Karam is an Associate in the Labor & Employment Practice Group. She can be reached at 216.363.1502 or gkaram@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.
Managing Risk When Terminating Vendor Relationships
Terminating a vendor relationship is not as simple as stopping performance. Companies should carefully follow the contract’s termination provisions, including notice requirements, cure periods and other procedural obligations. Failure to do so can create breach-of-contract claims even when vendor performance issues exist.
Is Your PFAS Coverage at Risk? An Ohio Federal Court Ruling Opens the Door to Broader Insurer Denials
The federal holding in Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., the first of its kind, could reshape how insurers respond to PFAS-related coverage demands. Fire-Dex, a manufacturer of firefighter turnout gear, was sued by firefighters who alleged that exposure to PFAS from the gear caused cancer.