Client Alerts & Insights
New China Tariffs January 1 – Biden Administration’s Section 301 Modifications Effective at Start of 2025
December 26, 2024
Authored By:
Higher tariffs are coming for some domestic importers even before President-Elect Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2025. Our team has been reporting throughout the year on the Biden Administration’s recent use of the Section 301 investigations targeting imports from the People’s Republic of China. Most recently, the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) published a notice on December 16, 2024, indicating that it will ring in the New Year by increasing customs duties on products imported from China under five tariff codes. 89 FR 101682.
USTR Katerine Tai describes the action as a modification of the existing Section 301 investigation to target goods of China origin intended to challenge domestic US investment in the clean energy sector. Specifically, imports of selected tungsten products, polysilicon, and wafers will see increased duty exposure. Duties on tungsten products will increase 25% across three tariff subheadings. Duties on polysilicon and wafers will increase 50% under one subheading each. These modifications are in response to the latest statutory review of the Section 301 action and public comments received from domestic US stakeholders throughout 2024.
It is clear from this action and the historic trendline that the US perception of trade with China is largely a bipartisan issue – and one that will extend into the Trump 47 Administration. Each major US political party views China’s practices and policies related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation as placing an unacceptable burden on domestic US production and commercial interests. Our 2024 bulletins on this issue with analysis and practical next steps are available here:
- Immediate Next Steps for New China Tariffs
- Action Items for New China Tariffs
- China Tariffs – New Section 301 Customs Duties Effective September 27, 2024
The immediate action item begins as always with strong sales and operations planning. The duty impact will start as goods are entered or withdrawn for consumption on January 1, 2025. This means that purchasing, sales, manufacturing activities, and inventory requirements may require adjustment to the extent possible since the landed cost of those items will immediately increase.
No one-size-fits all strategy exists to mitigate tariff impact although tools are available to help navigate the path forward. Confirmation of tariff applicability is always recommended to determine whether the tariff codes used today are indeed correct based upon the nature of each item and its country of origin. Going forward opportunities will exist for sourcing alternate foreign supply, negotiating cost drivers with suppliers, lawful tariff engineering of inputs and finished goods, and using methods to aid in cashflow management such as import under bond or duty drawback.
Jonathan R. Todd is Vice-Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice Group at Benesch. He may be reached at 216.363.4658 and jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Vanessa I. Gomez is an Associate in the Practice Group and may be reached at 216.363.4482 and vgomez@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.
California SB 54 Is Here: What Companies Using Plastic Packaging Need To Do Now
Learn how California’s SB 54 impacts companies using plastic packaging, including key compliance deadlines, producer responsibilities, and steps to reduce risk under new recycling and sustainability regulations.