Client Alerts & Insights
California Voters to Decide Future of California’s Controversial Private Attorneys General Act
April 11, 2024
Authored By:
A bill on the ballot in California this November asks the state’s voters to give the controversial Private Attorney General’s Act (PAGA) a final approval or rejection. The bill, called the California Employee Civil Action Law Initiative (CECALI), is backed by a pro-business political action committee, and the initiative recently qualified for the Nov. 5 state ballot after it received more than 700,000 valid signatures in its support.
As we have reported many times over the years (see, e.g. our articles written on June 16, 2022, April 5, 2022, and December 17, 2021, February 25, 2020, and March 28, 2019) PAGA is a controversial law unique to California which has been tested in both the California Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court on several occasions. PAGA gives individual employees the right to step into the shoes of both the California Attorney General and certain other “aggrieved employees” to enforce provisions of California’s Labor Code. PAGA has been hotly debated in employment-law circles ever since it was signed into law in 2003 by then Governor Gray Davis five days after he was recalled by California voters. Many argue that PAGA does more to benefit the California Plaintiff’s bar than it does employees in the state.
If adopted by voters, CECALI would repeal PAGA and replace it with new legislation that would permit the Labor Commissioner, only, to award penalties under CECALI. Those penalties are: (1) whatever statutory penalty amount is set forth in the Labor Code or $100 per pay period for the initial violation and $200 per pay period for each subsequent violation. In addition, CECALI doubles the statutory penalties for all willful violations under both the Labor Code and CECALI. Importantly, the law requires that 100% of monetary penalties assessed be awarded to employees, while barring Plaintiffs’ attorneys from recovering any fees unless otherwise specified by California’s labor code. Under PAGA’s current framework, only 25% of penalties assessed go to employees while the remaining 75% is earmarked to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency. In addition, PAGA permits the recovery of attorneys’ fees. The new law would also provide resources to employers to ensure that they can comply with state labor laws, a significant benefit to California employers already burdened by the state’s byzantine labor code and associated regulations.
Given the significant competing interests at issue, CECALI is by no means a sure winner in November. Regardless of the outcome, Benesch’s Labor and Employment group will continue to monitor all PAGA updates, as well as other ballot initiatives that could impact California employers, and will report on all relevant matters here.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group:
W. Eric Baisden at 216.363.4676 or ebaisden@beneschlaw.com;
Adam Primm at 216.363.4451 or aprimm@beneschlaw.com.
Joseph R. Blalock at 614.229.9359 or jblalock@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Increased CARB Enforcement of Diesel Transport Refrigeration Units (TRUs) Rocks Transporters and Receivers of Refrigerated Shipments in California
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is expected to ramp up enforcement of the amended Airborne Toxic Control Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units. These rules impose registration, reporting and compliance obligations on both TRU owners and the facilities that receive refrigerated shipments.
Michigan’s Long-Awaited Anti-SLAPP Law: An Overview for Litigators
Michigan’s Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (“UPEPA”), effective March 24, 2026, is designed to combat Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, commonly known as “SLAPP” suits. Until now, Michigan was one of the few remaining states without an anti-SLAPP statute.
New 301 Tariffs Coming – Immediate Action Items for Supply Chains
The White House is progressing on its two-step plan to impose tariffs following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision overturning IEEPA tariffs. First, new Section 122 surcharges were announced effective February 24.
DOJ Solidifies Its Universal Policy for Corporate Cooperation Credits
Key Takeaways: On March 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice unveiled the first-ever, department-wide corporate criminal enforcement policy aimed …