Client Alerts & Insights
DOJ Launches New Task Force Targeting Nursing Homes that Provide “Grossly Substandard Care”
March 5, 2020
Authored By:
On March 3, 2020 the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced the launch of a new task force, the “National Nursing Home Initiative”, to enhance civil and criminal efforts to pursue nursing homes that provide “grossly substandard care”.
The DOJ identified the following factors as indicators of “grossly substandard care”: failure to provide adequate nurse staffing, failure to follow basic infection control and hygiene protocols, failure to ensure appropriate feeding and nutrition programs, withholding pain medication, and the use of physical and/or chemical restraints to sedate residents.
This task force is part of the DOJ’s larger strategy and commitment to protecting the growing population of seniors in the United States, aside from the fraud enforcement activities that have garnered much attention in recent years. Operation of this task force will fall under the larger umbrella of the DOJ’s “Elder Justice Task Forces”, and will bring together federal, state and local agencies to target problematic providers, including the DOJ, the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, state Medicaid Fraud Control Units, HHS, state Adult Protective Services Agencies, and law enforcement.
According to the DOJ press release, approximately 30 nursing homes in nine states are already under investigation. The DOJ press release does not indicate whether there will be any correlation between nursing facilities targeted by the new task force and those nursing facilities included as participants and/or candidates for the CMS “Special Focus Facility” program.
If implemented correctly, this task force could act as a positive development for the overwhelming majority of nursing homes and nursing home owners because it would direct the attention of the government upon those ‘bad players’ that undermine the overwhelmingly positive care being provided day in and day out. Ultimately, however, the impact of this task force will be depend upon whether or not the government identifies the appropriate metrics and data points for evaluating quality. Maintaining the wrong focus could result in the inadvertent targeting and penalization of quality providers due to the government’s overreaction to isolated incidents.
Being proactive is the first and best step for those hoping to avoid increased government scrutiny. All nursing homes should ensure that they have an active and effective QAPI program, and that they are otherwise taking steps to ensure compliance with the updates to the Requirements of Participation set forth in 42 CFR Part 483 with respect to quality of care. Avoidance is far easier, far less disruptive, and far less costly compared to correcting problems that have occurred.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of Benesch’s Healthcare+ Practice Group:
Mark Silberman at msilberman@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4952;
Dan O’Brien at dobrien@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4691.
Latest News
Judicial Green Light: Court Upholds NLRB’s Cemex Decision
On April 21st, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC., reinforcing a significant shift in federal labor law governing union recognition and employer conduct during organizing campaigns.
The LEAD Model—Kidney Care’s Value-Based Care Journey LEADs Here
The new LEAD Model, launching in 2027, is CMS’s next-generation value-based care framework for kidney care, integrating CKD and ESRD patients into standard ACOs with a 10-year benchmark period, new payment options and greater flexibility for nephrology-led organizations.
DOL Proposes Universal Guidance Meant to Simplify Joint Employer Analysis
On April 22, 2026, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division proposed a new rule to clarify joint employer status and the related analysis under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Protection Act (“MSAPA”).
Only the Strong Survive: Easy Pitfalls to Avoid as a Defamation Plaintiff
Filing a defamation lawsuit is one thing. Surviving the inevitable motion to dismiss is another. A recent case out of the Eastern District of North Carolina, McKnight v. FOXY/WFXC/K 107.1/104.3 Radio Station, et al., Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-102, provides a useful case study in the kinds of missteps that can doom a defamation complaint before it ever reaches discovery.