Client Alerts & Insights
FTC Announces Temporary Suspension of Early Terminations for HSR Filing Waiting Period; Reduced Filing Thresholds Go Into Effect on March 4
February 5, 2021
Authored By:
Early Terminations for HSR Filings Temporarily Suspended
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that both agencies will temporarily suspend the discretionary practice of early terminations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) waiting period for mergers raising the possibility of antitrust issues. Prior to the announcement, parties could apply to the FTC or DOJ to terminate the HSR 30-day waiting period prior to its expiration, allowing a deal to proceed faster. The FTC anticipates the suspension will be brief, noting a similar temporary suspension of early termination grants in March 2020 following the implementation of an e-filing system. The agency has referenced the transition to a new administration, the unprecedented volume of merger filings received at the start of the year and the ongoing pandemic as the basis of this temporary suspension. For the time being, parties who anticipate needing HSR approval should plan to wait the full 30 days after filing before being able to close their transaction, even if there are no competitive concerns raised by the transaction other than meeting the size thresholds.
HSR Filing Thresholds Reduced
The FTC’s latest annual adjustment of the statutory thresholds under the HSR Act will result in a decrease in thresholds from the prior year. The annual HSR threshold adjustments are tied to changes in gross national product, and accordingly the overall decline in the US economy in 2020 resulted in a threshold reduction. The only other time the HSR threshold has been reduced from the prior year was in 2010 following the Great Recession. Effective March 4, 2021, the new HSR size-of-the-transaction thresholds go into effect. The revised HSR thresholds will apply for transactions that close on or after March 4, 2021. The HSR filing fees remain unchanged.
HSR Act or Rule Provision |
2021 Indexed Value |
US$50 million size-of-transaction test |
US$92.0 million |
US$200 million size-of-transaction test |
US$368.0 million |
US$100 million size-of-person test |
US$184.0 million |
US$10 million size-of-person test |
US$18.4 million |
US$50 million notification threshold |
US$92.0 million |
US$100 million notification threshold |
US$184.0 million |
US$500 million notification threshold |
US$919.9 million |
25% of voting securities valued at US$1 billion notification threshold |
US$1,839.8 million |
US$110 million foreign exemption threshold |
US$202.4 million |
For more information on these HSR changes and how they may affect your filing, contact Connie Porter.
Connie Porter at cporter@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4433.
Latest News
Versata v. Ford: Federal Circuit Reinstates $82M Award and Opens Door to Even Greater Damages
Recently, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Michigan’s ruling that Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) misappropriated Versata Software Inc.’s (“Versata”) trade secrets and breached a software licensing agreement. The three-judge panel ordered a new trial on trade secret damages, finding that the lower court improperly limited available damages theories, and reinstated the jury’s $82.3 million award from Ford’s breach of the software licensing agreement.
UPDATED: The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Tariff Refund Litigation: A Primer on Common Plaintiff’s Theories of Recovery and Importer of Record Defenses
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump did not have constitutional authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Trump Administration responded quickly, implementing a universal 10 percent surcharge under the authority of Section 122 of the U.S. Trade Act.
Supreme Court 2025: Key Free Speech Rulings
The Supreme Court’s 2025 decisions signaled a more regulator-friendly view of the internet—upholding laws on age verification and foreign-owned platforms under intermediate scrutiny, even where speech is burdened. These cases reaffirm that content-neutral rules that incidentally affect speech are likely to survive constitutional challenge.