Client Alerts & Insights
FTC Appeals Noncompete Ban Ruling
October 22, 2024
Authored By:
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has appealed a ruling from a federal court in Texas that blocked its sweeping ban of noncompete agreements. As Benesch previously highlighted in August, a federal district court in Texas permanently blocked the FTC’s attempt to ban noncompete agreements, determining that the ban exceeded the FTC’s authority and, thus, was an illegal attempt to expand the FTC’s rulemaking authority. The Texas Court also found that the ban was arbitrary and capricious and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. If it had been implemented, the FTC rule would have banned nearly all noncompete agreements between employers and employees as “unfair method[s] of competition.”
On October 18th, the FTC filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit is unlikely to reverse the Texas Court’s opinion. Many of the Biden Administration’s regulatory endeavors have been struck down by the Fifth Circuit in the past (such as the Department of Labor’s tip credit rule, which the Fifth Circuit vacated in August). Whether the FTC continues its litigation also could depend on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, as the FTC previously voted 3-2 along party lines to approve the ban, with both Republican commissioners voting against the ban.
The notice of appeal does not, by itself, impact the status of the noncompete ban, and employers can continue to use noncompete agreements (subject to the many state law considerations that apply). However, employers should continue to review their noncompete practices as this litigation continues. Benesch attorneys are ready to assist employers in reviewing their noncompete agreements and practices and will continue to monitor the status of this litigation as it heads to the Fifth Circuit. For more information, please contact:
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Scott Humphrey at shumphrey@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6420.
Charles Leuin at cleuin@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6344.
Latest News
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.
Section 301 Duties for Forced Labor – Step 3 in IEEPA Replacement and its Impact
The White House initiated its third step in replacing IEEPA tariffs on Friday, July 24. Specifically, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published final Section 301 findings and duty rates for imports from 30 countries following its investigation of harms on the domestic industry due to forced labor in those countries’ supply chains.
New York City’s Protected Time Off Law (PTOL) Final Rules Effective as of July 23, 2026
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has adopted final rules implementing the City’s significantly expanded Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA), now referred to as the Protected Time Off Law (PTOL).