Client Alerts & Insights
FTC Appeals Noncompete Ban Ruling
October 22, 2024
Authored By:
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has appealed a ruling from a federal court in Texas that blocked its sweeping ban of noncompete agreements. As Benesch previously highlighted in August, a federal district court in Texas permanently blocked the FTC’s attempt to ban noncompete agreements, determining that the ban exceeded the FTC’s authority and, thus, was an illegal attempt to expand the FTC’s rulemaking authority. The Texas Court also found that the ban was arbitrary and capricious and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. If it had been implemented, the FTC rule would have banned nearly all noncompete agreements between employers and employees as “unfair method[s] of competition.”
On October 18th, the FTC filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit is unlikely to reverse the Texas Court’s opinion. Many of the Biden Administration’s regulatory endeavors have been struck down by the Fifth Circuit in the past (such as the Department of Labor’s tip credit rule, which the Fifth Circuit vacated in August). Whether the FTC continues its litigation also could depend on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, as the FTC previously voted 3-2 along party lines to approve the ban, with both Republican commissioners voting against the ban.
The notice of appeal does not, by itself, impact the status of the noncompete ban, and employers can continue to use noncompete agreements (subject to the many state law considerations that apply). However, employers should continue to review their noncompete practices as this litigation continues. Benesch attorneys are ready to assist employers in reviewing their noncompete agreements and practices and will continue to monitor the status of this litigation as it heads to the Fifth Circuit. For more information, please contact:
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Scott Humphrey at shumphrey@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6420.
Charles Leuin at cleuin@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6344.
Latest News
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.
Supply Chain Security – C-TPAT Program Growing in Significance for U.S. Operations
Geopolitical challenges are triggering executive-level focus on supply chain security across industrial sectors and transportation service providers, including renewed interest in the Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) program.
BREAKING: Seventh Circuit Holds Text Messages are not Telephone Calls Under Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA
In a significant post-Loper Bright win for defendants, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398, affirming a trial court ruling that “§ 227(c)(5) [of the TCPA] does not permit plaintiffs to sue for the receipt of unwanted texts . . . .”
Connecticut’s New PFAS Rules: What Businesses Need to Know About the Regulations and Covered Product Categories
Connecticut has joined the growing roster of states cracking down on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), the so-called “forever chemicals” long prized for their water resistance, stain resistance, and non-stick performance.