Client Alerts & Insights
Just a Simple Misunderstanding? The Latest Argument from the United States Department of Treasury Concerning the Constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act.
April 23, 2024
Authored By:
As expected, shortly after receiving the Order from Judge Liles C. Burke of the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that rendered unconstitutional the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”), the United States Department of Treasury (the “Treasury”) expeditiously filed an appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a brief filed on Monday, April 15, 2024, the Treasury posited that Judge Burke simply misunderstood the scope and purpose of the CTA when analyzing its constitutionality.
Recall that on March 1, 2024, Judge Burke found that the CTA exceeded the constitutional limitations on congressional power. More specifically, he found that the CTA lacks “a sufficient nexus to any enumerated power to be a necessary and proper means of achieving Congress’ policy goals.” He also believed that the interpretation proffered by the Treasury with regard to the necessary and proper clause was too broad, as was the argument that the CTA is justified by the commerce clause.
In its most recent filing, the Treasury rebuts the aforementioned position by arguing that rather than a “single-subject statute,” the CTA plays a key role in a larger, federal government-based program to combat financial crime. According to the Treasury, Congress found that the information sought pursuant to the CTA is necessary to detect and prosecute financial crime.
Additionally, as argued in the lower court, the Treasury maintained that Congress understood the CTA to be essential in implementing its commerce and foreign affairs powers, as well as the power of the President over law enforcement and foreign affairs.
The Parties to the appeal agreed to an expedited briefing and argument schedule as evidenced by their recently filed joint motion. That motion is pending before the Court.
The CTA sets forth a compliance deadline of January 1, 2025 and applies to most covered entities. As advised in a previous bulletin, those entities should continue making arrangements to comply with the reporting requirements set forth in therein. That includes pairing with knowledgeable, forward-thinking outside counsel who are up-to-speed with regard to its requirements and path through the court system(s).
If you have questions regarding the CTA or the impact of the pending appeal, the White Collar and Corporate & Securities Practice Groups at Benesch are here to help.
Marisa T. Darden at mdarden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4440.
Jennifer L. Stapleton at jstapleton@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4428.
Allyson Cady at acady@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6214.
Latest News
IEEPA Tariff Refunds Challenged in Court – Q&A for Supply Chains
Many of our clients have filed declarations to receive International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) tariff refunds for “Phase 1” of the new refund process. Some have already received those funds. Recent Department of Justice (“DOJ”) actions between June 2 and June 9, 2026, raise questions about the viability of this administrative process for duty refunds beyond those allowed in Phase 1.
Versata v. Ford: Federal Circuit Reinstates $82M Award and Opens Door to Even Greater Damages
Recently, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Michigan’s ruling that Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) misappropriated Versata Software Inc.’s (“Versata”) trade secrets and breached a software licensing agreement. The three-judge panel ordered a new trial on trade secret damages, finding that the lower court improperly limited available damages theories, and reinstated the jury’s $82.3 million award from Ford’s breach of the software licensing agreement.
UPDATED: The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Tariff Refund Litigation: A Primer on Common Plaintiff’s Theories of Recovery and Importer of Record Defenses
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump did not have constitutional authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Trump Administration responded quickly, implementing a universal 10 percent surcharge under the authority of Section 122 of the U.S. Trade Act.