Client Alerts & Insights
Just a Simple Misunderstanding? The Latest Argument from the United States Department of Treasury Concerning the Constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act.
April 23, 2024
Authored By:
As expected, shortly after receiving the Order from Judge Liles C. Burke of the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that rendered unconstitutional the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”), the United States Department of Treasury (the “Treasury”) expeditiously filed an appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a brief filed on Monday, April 15, 2024, the Treasury posited that Judge Burke simply misunderstood the scope and purpose of the CTA when analyzing its constitutionality.
Recall that on March 1, 2024, Judge Burke found that the CTA exceeded the constitutional limitations on congressional power. More specifically, he found that the CTA lacks “a sufficient nexus to any enumerated power to be a necessary and proper means of achieving Congress’ policy goals.” He also believed that the interpretation proffered by the Treasury with regard to the necessary and proper clause was too broad, as was the argument that the CTA is justified by the commerce clause.
In its most recent filing, the Treasury rebuts the aforementioned position by arguing that rather than a “single-subject statute,” the CTA plays a key role in a larger, federal government-based program to combat financial crime. According to the Treasury, Congress found that the information sought pursuant to the CTA is necessary to detect and prosecute financial crime.
Additionally, as argued in the lower court, the Treasury maintained that Congress understood the CTA to be essential in implementing its commerce and foreign affairs powers, as well as the power of the President over law enforcement and foreign affairs.
The Parties to the appeal agreed to an expedited briefing and argument schedule as evidenced by their recently filed joint motion. That motion is pending before the Court.
The CTA sets forth a compliance deadline of January 1, 2025 and applies to most covered entities. As advised in a previous bulletin, those entities should continue making arrangements to comply with the reporting requirements set forth in therein. That includes pairing with knowledgeable, forward-thinking outside counsel who are up-to-speed with regard to its requirements and path through the court system(s).
If you have questions regarding the CTA or the impact of the pending appeal, the White Collar and Corporate & Securities Practice Groups at Benesch are here to help.
Marisa T. Darden at mdarden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4440.
Jennifer L. Stapleton at jstapleton@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4428.
Allyson Cady at acady@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6214.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.