Client Alerts & Insights
New Guidance from SEC About the Use of Social Media by Public Companies
April 1, 2013
Authored By:
The SEC is warming up to social media.
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, the SEC issued a press release that clarifies its position that a company may use social media outlets to announce key information, and that such disclosure will comply with Regulation Fair Disclosure (Regulation FD), as long as the company has previously alerted the investing public regarding what social media outlets it will use.
The press release was accompanied by a report on the results of the Division of Enforcement’s investigation into social media use by Netflix CEO Reed Hastings. In July 2012, Mr. Hastings posted on his personal Facebook page that Netflix users were enjoying “nearly a billion hours per month” of streaming video, and proceeded to congratulate Netflix’s chief content officer for reaching that number. As a result, the SEC began an investigation (made public by Netflix on December 5, 2012) of the company and Mr. Hastings for violations of Regulation FD, Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and various other rules for selective disclosure of material non-public information (for more information on prior investigations into social media use and Regulation FD please click here).
In Tuesday’s report, the SEC took the opportunity to provide some direction to companies in regard to their social media use. The SEC analogized its 2008 guidance on dissemination of information through company websites to the current issue of dissemination of information by means of social media. While the SEC emphasized that every case must be evaluated on its own facts, it reiterated that the main focus will be on whether all investors have the opportunity to gain access to material non-public information at the same time.
With that directive in mind, the SEC stated that a company should provide appropriate notice to the investing public of the specific channels that the company will use to disseminate material, nonpublic information. Referring to the 2008 guidance, the SEC stated that it encourages companies to include in their various publications, including press releases, disclosures, and other periodic reports, any means by which they will be publishing such material nonpublic information. Therefore, if a company wishes to use Twitter, Facebook or any other social media outlet to disseminate material nonpublic information, providing notice of the intended outlet to investors through already recognized channels before the fact would place all investors on equal footing to receive those important disclosures.
George Canellos, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, summed up the Commission’s attitude toward social media by stating, “most social media are perfectly suitable methods for communicating with investors, but not if the access is restricted or if investors don’t know that’s where they need to turn to get the latest news.” What is important is that investors and the public are aware what social media outlet is being used as a method of publication, and that access to that outlet is available to all.
The same rules apply for the social media account of an executive or other representative of a company. Simply the fact that that individual has a large number of followers or subscribers is not enough to consider publications from that account “reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public.” Again, what is important is that the company make the public aware that material information may be introduced by means of that executive’s Twitter, Facebook or other outlet prior to any material dissemination and that that outlet is available to all.
While the SEC suggests that whenever possible, companies should still adhere to the practice of submitting material nonpublic information to the SEC prior to public disclosure though other medium, the SEC has provided its guidance regarding an approved method of using social media to get the company’s information out to the investing public.
Additional Information
For assistance in developing or reviewing your policies, processes and procedures or if you have questions regarding this area of disclosure and enforcement, please contact any of our securities
attorneys below:
Megan L. Mehalko at (216) 363-4487 or mmehalko@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.
Chameleon Carriers—FMCSA’s “Reincarnated” Rule and Enforcement
As the U.S. DOT and its FMCSA ramp up certain elements of domestic enforcement, regulators are utilizing existing laws and regulations that previously were not often invoked. Enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement is one great example.
What’s Old Is New Again: Broker Liability Insulation from the Case Law in the Post-Montgomery Era
The Supreme Court has spoken in its Montgomery v. Caribe Transport decision, and the brokerage sector, and even shipper and motor carriers, are working toward adapting to this “new liability regime.”