Client Alerts & Insights
PAGA Reform Package Strikes Balance: Boost for Workers, Relief for Employers
June 21, 2024
Authored By:
As we reported here, California voters had been tasked with deciding the future of California’s controversial Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”).
PAGA gives individual employees the right to step into the shoes of both the California Attorney General and certain other “aggrieved employees” to enforce provisions of California’s Labor Code. Under the current law, workers can collect a quarter of the monetary penalties for state labor law violations, and the rest of the recovered funds go to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency. These cases can be extraordinarily expensive for employers, with some reports suggesting that the law has cost employers in California close to $10 billion since the law’s implementation in 2003.
As of June 19, 2024, however, it appears that major power brokers in the state, including Governor Gavin Newsom, Senate President pro Tempore Mike McGuire, and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, and other entities representing both employer and employee interests, have struck a deal in the form of a PAGA reform package that could take the PAGA issue off the ballot this fall.
According to proponents of the deal, the reforms to PAGA will ensure workers in California continue to have a strong vehicle to get labor claims resolved, while also limiting the frivolous litigation that has cost employers billions over the last 21 years. While the text of any new or amended legislation is not yet available (but is anticipated next week), key elements of the reform package reportedly include:
- An increased share of penalties going to employees (from 25% to 35%)
- Requires that the plaintiff who files a PAGA claim must have actually suffered an alleged labor code violation
- Limits the violations that can form the basis of a penalty award to those occurring in the last year
- Limits, in certain situations, penalties to 15% of the applicable penalty amount
- Reduces maximum penalties related to wage statement violations that did not cause confusion or harm to the employee
The reform package also includes an employer right to cure and provides an opportunity for early resolution.
While the reform package’s announcement should be welcome news to employers in California, the fight against PAGA is not finished. The California Legislature must act on the reform package, and it must be signed into law by Governor Newsome, on or before June 27. If that does not happen, the Fix PAGA Coalition will keep its PAGA reform measure on the November ballot, and voters will be asked to weigh in on the law at the polls.
Benesch was honored to have been involved in the negotiations for this monumental deal via our association with the California Retailers Association. We will continue to monitor the proposed legislation and its potential impacts.
For more information, contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group or Stephanie Sheridan from the Retail & E-Commerce Group, who serves on the Board of Directors for the California Retailers Association.
Adam Primm at 216.363.4451 or aprimm@beneschlaw.com.
Yelena Katz at 216.363.4405 or ykatz@beneschlaw.com.
Joseph Blalock at 614.229.9359 or jblalock@beneschlaw.com.
Stephanie Sheridan at 628.600.2250 or ssheridan@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.