Client Alerts & Insights
Preliminary Injunction Partially Blocks FTC Noncompete Ban
July 3, 2024
Authored By:
Earlier today, a federal court in Texas made a preliminary ruling that partially blocks the FTC’s rule that rendered most noncompetes in this country unenforceable (the “FTC Ban”). The FTC’s Ban was set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. Judge Ada Brown of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the FTC’s Ban, agreeing with the plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors that the FTC lacked substantive rulemaking authority with respect to what they deemed to be unfair methods of competition. The Court also held the FTC Ban to be arbitrary and capricious, and that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits. The Court indicated that it planned to make its final ruling on the merits on August 30, 2024. The case could then be appealed to the United States 5thCircuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which is known for its opposition to President Biden’s policies.
Although today’s order limits the delay of the enforcement of the FTC Ban to the plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenors in the case, there will be considerable efforts to convince this judge to block the FTC’s Ban nationwide when she issues her final ruling on August 30. Additionally, another challenge to the FTC’s Ban is set to be heard at a hearing in federal court in Philadelphia on July 10. We expect there to be significant litigation in the coming months relating to the enforceability of the FTC Ban, and we will keep you apprised of further developments.
Scott Humphrey at shumphrey@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6420.
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Charles Leuin at cleuin@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6344.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.