Client Alerts & Insights
Reefer Madness and Beyond – What Happens in California Doesn’t Stay in California
May 7, 2018
Authored By:
On April 18, 2018, the California Air Resource Board (CARB) issued a press release touting $152K they are collecting to “fund air pollution research, improve children’s health and install air monitors.” The money comes from two out-of-state companies, Marten (Marten Transport Logistics, LLC, Marten Transport Services, LTD., and Marten Transport, LTD.) and Roadrunner Transportation System. Marten and Roadrunner were accused by CARB of failing to verify that trucks they hire for service in California were compliant with California’s Truck and Bus Regulation.
According CARB, “We do everything in our power to protect Californians from high polluting vehicles and their many negative health impacts, including enforcement of our strict laws.”
Most companies in the transportation industry have been aware that California has strict regulations regarding Transport Refrigeration Units (TRUs or “reefers”.) However, CARB regulations apply not only to reefers, but to almost any vehicle with a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds. The regulations apply to, but are not limited to, shippers, brokers, freight forwarders, and carriers.
CARB accused Marten and Roadrunner of failing to verify that each vehicle they hire or dispatch in California is in compliance with CARB regulations. The fine for failing to verify is up to $25,000 per day. Both Marten and Roadrunner entered into settlement agreements, Marten for $100,000 and Roadrunner for $52,250.
Shippers, brokers, and freight forwarders are not required to inspect equipment to ensure compliance, but must show that they conducted due diligence to ensure compliance. Due diligence might include (1) requiring motor carriers to provide evidence that they registered their reefers in the Air Resources Board Equipment Registration (ARBER) system, (2) sending letters to all carriers that operate within California, as well as to those that hire them (3PLs), spelling out requirements, and (3) strengthening contract language regarding CARB compliance.
Based on CARB’s aggressive enforcement and their reach beyond California and reefers, it is time for everyone to review their procedures before California reaches out to them.
If you have any questions regarding these regulations, contact a member of Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group.
Martha J. Payne (Author) at mpayne@beneschlaw.com or 541.764.2859
John C. Gentile (Contributor) at jgentile@beneschlaw.com or 302.442.7071
Eric L. Zalud at ezalud@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4178
Marc S. Blubaugh at mblubaugh@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9382
Stephanie S. Penninger at spenninger@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4981
Jonathan Todd at jtodd@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4658
Latest News
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.
Supply Chain Security – C-TPAT Program Growing in Significance for U.S. Operations
Geopolitical challenges are triggering executive-level focus on supply chain security across industrial sectors and transportation service providers, including renewed interest in the Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) program.
BREAKING: Seventh Circuit Holds Text Messages are not Telephone Calls Under Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA
In a significant post-Loper Bright win for defendants, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398, affirming a trial court ruling that “§ 227(c)(5) [of the TCPA] does not permit plaintiffs to sue for the receipt of unwanted texts . . . .”
Connecticut’s New PFAS Rules: What Businesses Need to Know About the Regulations and Covered Product Categories
Connecticut has joined the growing roster of states cracking down on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), the so-called “forever chemicals” long prized for their water resistance, stain resistance, and non-stick performance.