Alexandra Goss
Associate
Overview
Alexandra’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, including contract disputes and business torts, identifying innovative solutions for complex legal problems.
Alexandra works with transportation and logistics clients with cargo disputes, torts and other logistics-related claims. She handles a broad range of business conflicts, including contract disputes, regulatory investigations, shareholder and partnership disputes, arbitration, mediation and trial. In fact, Alexandra assisted on complex civil and criminal matters at both the state and federal level, in various courts across the country.
By aligning client goals and legal strategies, Alexandra provides meaningful advice while simultaneously furnishing innovative legal solutions. Taking a holistic approach, Alexandra balances business priorities that support both short and long-term objectives, with a focus on finding effective and creative solutions.
What I Do
Experience
Defended and obtained dismissal of various officers, directors, principals, and corporate affiliates of a motor carrier in an action arising out of a fatal highway accident for which the plaintiff was seeking to pierce the corporate veil and impose alter ego liability.
Successfully negotiated a settlement on an outstanding cargo claim on behalf of a freight broker.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- CALI Award, Trial Practice
- Third Place, Lawrence Negotiation Competition
- Competitor, The Closer Negotiation Competition
- Competitor, Weschler First Amendment, Schreck Gaming, and Native American Law Moot Court Competitions
- Online Editor, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law
- Certified Legal Intern, Justice for Children Clinic
- Diversity and Inclusion Chair, Women in Law Society
- Minor in Spanish
Bar & Court Admissions
Related News & Insights
The CFTC’s New Cooperation Playbook: What Practitioners Need to Know About Letter No. 26-15
In a recent Staff Advisory to the Enforcement Division , the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) released guidance on how companies can avoid enforcement actions—or receive substantial penalty reductions—through early and full disclosure of potential misconduct.
Social Media Might Have to Rethink Platform Design and Features as Courts Reject Communications Decency Act, Section 230 Defense
On April 10, 2026, on appeal from a motion to dismiss, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that section 230 of the Communications Decency Act did not bar Massachusetts’s claims that Meta engaged in unfair business practices by creating a platform that was addictive to teens and failing to warn the public about it.
California’s Social Media Litigation Poses Potential to Reshape the Legal Landscape
Major social media companies are facing a wave of personal injury lawsuits in California state and federal courts, with recent settlements by TikTok and Snap leaving Meta and Google heading to trial over claims that addictive platform features harm teens’ mental health.
Demurrage and Detention Billing After WSC v. FMC
Key risks surrounding demurrage and detention billing after WSC v FMC are creating new challenges for organizations navigating regulatory requirements.