David M. Krueger
Co-Chair, Privacy Litigation & Compliance Practice Group; CIPP/US
Overview
David is a partner in Benesch’s Litigation Practice Group, Co-Chair of the Privacy Litigation & Compliance Group, and is a member of the Retail & E-Commerce and Transportation & Logistics practice groups.
Privacy & Class Action Litigation Defense
With deep expertise in consumer privacy laws, and as a Certified Information Privacy Professional, United States (CIPP/US) through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), David represents and advises companies in individual and class action lawsuits involving federal privacy statutes such as the TCPA, Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), online tracking and advertising statutes, and analogous related state laws (CIPA, FCCPA, etc.).
David has defended claims of all sizes across the country, from small individual lawsuits through class actions involving billion-dollar exposures, for companies of all sizes, and has the privilege of serving as national counsel for several Fortune 500 companies, responsible for coordinating litigation and strategies throughout the country. Text messages, telemarketing, e-commerce, video streaming, and online tracking and monitoring (cookies, pixels, etc.), are governed by a significant patchwork of various federal and state laws. David is an expert not only in the applicable law, but also in understanding the technologies that are central to developing novel and sophisticated defenses in advertising, customer contact, and privacy litigation.
In addition to litigation, David’s practice extends beyond the courtroom, and he counsels clients on how to develop policies and practices that comply with TCPA, the Federal Trade Commission’s Telemarketing Sales rules (TSR), the FCRA, other federal privacy and consumer protection statutes (COPPA, CAN-SPAM, CFPB regulations), and state specific laws and regulations regarding marketing, consumer credit, and customer contact. David also represents clients with respect to regulatory matters and investigations with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and state administrative and enforcement agencies.
Transportation & Aviation
As a member of the Transportation & Logistics group, David represents motor carriers, air carriers, brokers, and forwarders in a wide variety of business, cargo, and privacy claims. David has also defended carriers in a variety of class action lawsuits, including class action lawsuits alleging violations of the Truth-In-Leasing Regulations, FLSA, and the transportation-industry specific requirements under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
David also assists pilots, aircraft owners, and businesses on a wide variety of aviation specific matters, including airport classification and compliance, leaseback and purchase agreements, charter agreements, and Part 107 remote pilot and UAS registration and compliance. David is a member of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and maintains currency on his Private Pilot certificate.
Featured endorsements
Experience
Defended 10+ retailers involving claims under federal Wiretap Act and/or California Invasion of Privacy law concerning recording of chat conversation, use of session replay technology, and/or use of Facebook “Meta pixel.”
Won summary judgment in certified nationwide TCPA class action on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence that the seller sent or authorized the at-issue communications.
Obtained voluntary dismissal of VPPA class action involving Facebook “Meta pixel” after establishing that the plaintiff subscribed to services specifically for the purpose of manufacturing litigation.
Won summary judgment in TCPA action on the basis that the customer could not unilaterally revoke contractually provided consent.
Forced voluntary dismissal with prejudice of putative TCPA class action based on bad faith claim-splitting argument.
Represented multiple defendants in class action lawsuits for alleged violations of the Florida FCCPA by sending customer contact emails between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
Obtained dismissal of VPPA class action after establishing that the at-issue videos involving Facebook “Meta pixel” were publicly available and did not require subscription to access.
Successfully negotiated and resolved multi-party business dispute arising from breach of contract and fiduciary duty between former business partners, including negotiation on business loan.
In Donaca v. DISH Network L.L.C., No. 11-cv-02910, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19740 (D. Colo. Feb. 18, 2014), the class action defense team of Eric Zalud, Ben Kern, and David Krueger successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold DISH vicariously liable for 1+ million phone calls made by over a dozen third-parties in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b) and (c).
Successfully defeated plaintiff’s attempt to remand trucking liability claim to state court on grounds that concurrent jurisdiction did not destroy federal question jurisdiction for purposes of removal to federal court. (Acuity, a Mut. Ins. Co. v. YRC Inc., No. 12cv2497), 2013 WL 646218 (N.D. Ohio 2013).
In Fitzhenry v. ADT Corp., No. 14-80180, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166243 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 3, 2014), the class action defense team of Eric Zalud, Ben Kern, and David Krueger successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold ADT vicariously liable for approximately 5 million phone calls made by an independent third-party in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b).
Obtained dismissal of state law claims in suit seeking damages against transportation provider on grounds of federal preemption under Carmack Amendment.
Obtained denial of class certification against motor class in nationwide class action alleging breach of contract, fraud, and violations of the Truth In Leasing regulations.
Defended transportation company at trial, in suit alleging negligence in loading of cargo.
Represent aircraft owners and purchases in leaseback and purchase agreements.
Represented businesses in Part 107 Remote Pilot and UAV certification, compliance, and airspace regulations.
Obtained voluntary dismissal of suit alleging personal injury and wrongful death in connection with fatal transportation accident.
Won trial on behalf of corporation in suit seeking damages for breach of contract. Decision affirmed on appeal.
Won trial defending corporation in claim alleging breach of contract and violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act.
Defended corporation, directors, and majority shareholders in suit alleging fraud, successor-liability, Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act liability, and seeking to pierce corporate veil to holder shareholders individually liable.
Represented company for alleged cybersquatting, violations of Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and false designation of origin.
Defended corporation in suit seeking certification of state wide class action for alleged product defect.
Defended corporation in nationwide class action suit for alleged violations of the disclosure and adverse action requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Defended corporation in suit seeking class certification of claims alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Ohio Valentine (antitrust) Act.
Defended moving company for alleged violation of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations in putative nationwide class action.
Represented medical device manufacturer in arguing that state-law product design claims were preempted under Medical Device Amendments to FDCA.
Represented medical device manufacturer in defense of state law design and manufacturing defect claims of heart catheter.
Obtained dismissal of trucking liability claim under Carmack Amendment due to insufficient evidence of damage.
Obtained summary judgment in favor of newspaper publication in suit alleging defamation.
Obtained denial of class certification on behalf of corporate defendant in nationwide putative class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Sales Protection Act.
Obtained summary judgment in favor of employer in suit alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful discharge.
Successfully resolved multi-state class action alleging violations of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations by motor carrier.
Represent and advise airports on FAA airport compliance and reporting requirements.
Defended insurance company in suit seeking certification of class action for alleged wrongful denial of insurance benefits.
Successfully struck class allegations in putative state-wide class action alleging violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“CSPA”), fraud, and unjust enrichment, due to the plaintiff’s failure to adequately show “prior notice” necessary for a CSPA class action and allege secondary claims for fraud/unjust enrichment.
Garforth v. Sterling Jewelers Inc., Geauga Common Pleas No. 13X001124 (Nov. 21, 2014).
Obtained voluntary dismissal of product liability suit alleging design and manufacturing product defect in connection a hip implant.
Represented product manufacturer in suit alleging violations of California Proposition 65.
Obtained voluntary dismissal of nationwide putative class action against retailer of consumer products, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 USC 227(b).
Obtained summary judgment in favor of medical provider in federal civil rights claim.
Developed policies and procedures for complying with federal Fair Credit Reporting Act obligations (and state-level versions of the law) for nationwide business in connection with employment applications.
Successfully recovered $400,000 of wrongfully diverted funds in commission payments.
Provide compliance counseling to motor carriers and transportation brokers under federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.
Obtained summary judgment on behalf of financial institution for alleged violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act for allegedly misreporting spouse as co-holder of account.
Won motion to dismiss claim involving serial-plaintiff for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Ohio Telephone Solicitation Act, and Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act.
Successfully forced voluntary dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of California Labor Laws.
Successfully defeated nationwide putative class action for alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by compelling arbitration on an individual basis despite the consumer contesting that she was not bound by arbitration agreement.
Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant in Telephone Consumer Protection Act claim on grounds that the consumer did not use a reasonable method of attempting to revoke consent.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- Assistant Editor, Law Review
- magna cum laude
Clerkships and Bar Admissions
More
- Member, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
- Publications Vice-Chair of the Class Action Committee of the Defense Research Institute
- Member, Defense Research Institute
- Class Action Specialized Litigation Group
- Member, Lawyer Pilots Bar Association
- Listed, Ohio Super Lawyers – Rising Stars, 2014-2021, 2023, 2024
- Rated, “Excellent” – Avvo, 2014
Hobbies
Aviation, chess, running, tennis
Prized Possession
My pilot license
Favorite Vacation
Alaska, but really anywhere that is remote and has mountains
Related News & Insights
Opportunity and Uncertainty in Equal Measure: What You Should Know About the FCC’s Proposed TCPA Rulemaking
Key Takeaways: The FCC has proposed significant TCPA updates to simplify do-not-call rules, refine consent revocation, and strengthen caller ID …
Time to RE-act: The Washington Supreme Court’s Recent Email Subject Line Ruling Poised to Put Retailers on the Hook for Trillions (September 2025 Update)
Key Takeaways: The Washington Supreme Court adopted a broad interpretation of false or misleading information: Any false or misleading information …
Privacy Daily Quotes Benesch Partner David Krueger on VPPA Court Rulings
Benesch Partner David Krueger was featured in Privacy Daily’s article, “VPPA Decisions Not Always Centered Around Term Definitions, Privacy Lawyers …
Privacy Daily Quotes Benesch Partner David Krueger on VPPA Circuit Split and Potential SCOTUS Review
Privacy Daily featured insights from Benesch Partner David Krueger in its article, “Widened Circuit Split on Video Privacy Increases Chances of …