Eric L. Zalud
Co-Chair, Transportation & Logistics Practice Group; Vice-Chair, Litigation Practice Group
Overview
“Eric is an exceptional litigator, and his ability to wade through the “noise” associated with litigation to identify the key aspects of the matter at issue and then develop an effective and cost-effective defense strategy and related tactics separates him from 95% of the litigators we engage in other jurisdictions.” – Benesch client
“It’s not easy joining all the dots back to actual law, but of all the people I am lucky enough to work with I know if there is a way, Eric will find it.” – Benesch client
“We appreciate your work on this case and the terrific result you obtained for the company.” – Benesch client
“Eric is a foundational presence in the transportation arena. He is a seasoned litigator who has a deep understanding of businesses and the law.” – Benesch client
“Congratulations. You strategically out-foxed opposing counsel and pushed this to resolution. I hope we can work together again in the future.” – Benesch client
Main Bio
Eric is Co-Chair of the firm’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group and a Vice Chair of the Litigation Group.
Under Eric’s leadership, Benesch was named Law Firm of the Year for 2025, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017, 2016 and 2014 in the area of Transportation Law by Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”. Only one law firm per practice area in the U.S. receives this recognition each year, making this award a particularly significant achievement. For the twelfth consecutive year (2014-2025), Benesch also received a national first-tier ranking in Transportation Law also by Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms.”
Eric has litigated or arbitrated matters in 31 states, before state and federal trial and appellate courts in various jurisdictions, and before the Surface Transportation Board, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Olympic Committee, the Better Business Bureau, the Federal Maritime Commission and the Court of International Trade.
- Over the past 18 years, Eric has taken 37 cases to trial. His record in these cases is 34-3.
- In his litigation career, Eric has saved his clients $14.9 billion in potential exposure and risk, through his litigation wins for them.
- Eric was recognized as a 2025 “Litigation Star” by Benchmark Litigation.
- Eric has advised, consulted with, or litigated on behalf of, over 100 freight intermediaries across the country and the world.
- Over the past decade, Eric has been involved in over 50 Transportation & Logistics M&A transactions.
Eric focuses his practice primarily upon commercial litigation, transportation, logistics and e-commerce law consult and litigation, insurance, coverage and bad faith matters, and product liability matters, including medical device defense, consumer product defense and industrial product defense.
Product Liability Bio
Eric has litigated or arbitrated matters in 33 states, before state and federal trial and appellate courts in various jurisdictions, and before the Surface Transportation Board, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the United States Olympic Committee, the Better Business Bureau, the Federal Maritime Commission and the Court of International Trade.
Over the last 18 years, he has tried 35 cases, and his trial record is 31-4.
In his litigation career, Eric has saved his clients over $14.9 billion in potential litigation exposure and risk, through his litigation wins for them.
Eric has extensive medical device and pharmaceutical defense practice. In 2002, he was named Medmarc Medical Device Attorney of the Year. Overall, he has litigated over 100 product liability claims involving variety of biotech/life science products, including:
- Contact Lens Solution
- Bovie pads
- Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices of all kinds
- Bone Plates
- Hip and Knee Replacements of all kinds
- Exercise equipment (home and institutional)
- Hospital and nursing home bedrails
- Arthrex Transfix System
- CORx System
- Olecranon Plate
- Rascal Scooter
- Folding Walkcane
- CROW Walker and custom molded inserts
- KAFO orthotic leg brace
- GreenLight PV System
- Cough Syrup Additives
- Forceps
- Diet Supplements
- Implantable Morphine Pumps
- Cardiac Surgery Equipment
- Aortic Direct Ellipse Cannulae
- Laser Hair Removal Apparatus
- Cold Packs
- Ear Piercing Apparatus
- Lotstrand Crutches
- Home Oxygen Tanks
- Weight Loss Devices/Home Health Equipment
- Spinal Catheters
- Ephedra
- Wheelchair Lifts
- Pharmaceuticals/Thimerosal
- Snoring Prevention Devices
- Wheelchairs
- Walker/Enabling Devices
- Surgical Robots
- Protegen Bladder Slings
- Blood Pressure Machines.
He is also a regular attendee at the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers’ Annual Conference and has attended seminars at the Consumer Products Safety Commission. He has significant experience in fire litigation involving allegedly defective household products. He has served in the role of national coordinating counsel for several defendants in asbestos litigation over the years, and also defended sick building/toxic tort syndrome cases, Benzene cases, Thimerosal cases, popcorn butter cases, and environmental spill litigation.
He also has expertise in consumer product safety prevention matters. He has been involved in the formation and orchestration of product safety committee meetings and product liability programs, record retention programs, reviews of product warnings, reviews of privilege of critical self-analysis issues and recall procedures. He also has experience in responding to inquiries and investigations of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Federal Trade Commission. He also conducted internal seminars for claims departments and engineering departments of our insurance and manufacturing clients. This experience includes:
- Responding (or not, as appropriate) to over 1,000 CPSC incident reports.
- Completing lengthy and detailed CPSC reporting, including completing more than 100 decision tree analyses, as well as fulfilling reporting obligations for vendors, manufacturers, licensees, and distributors.
- Involvement in at least seven Voluntary Correction Actions (recalls) or potential VCAs, including extensive and elaborate recall proceedings and protocols. These recalls, or decisions as to whether or not to recall, have involved consumer products, and health related and personal care products, including wellness products, rejuvenation skin care products, personal nebulizers, personal tens units, and personal humidifier health care products and hay fever allergy devices.
- Responding to broad-based and specific CPSC investigations, including client meetings, and investigating the safety of specific products with respect to substantial product hazard determinations.
- Involvement in active follow-up reporting to the CPSC on specific products.
- Submitting FOIA Requests to the CPSC regarding competitive products.
- Defending against FOIA Requests to the CPSC regarding clients’ products.
- Reviewing over 100 prototype products for product safety, product testing, and warnings.
- Authoring warnings for at least 100 products, both on product and in manuals.
- Making numerous trips to the CPSC to meet with all departments, as well as the head of the CPSC, on all aspects of reporting and compliance.
- Holding in-house seminars for engineers/customer service representatives/quality controllers regarding preparation of internal documents to prevent smoking guns.
- Interfacing with the Drug and Poison Center on hundreds of consumer complaints relating to claims that consumers have been injured by various household, personal care and health and hygiene products, and followed those matters through to closure.
Eric also has Federal Trade Commission (FTC) related product advertising experience including:
- Authoring and critically reviewing marketing materials for in excess of 50 products.
- Screening Web sites and radio, TV, and print media programs for FTC compliance.
- Orchestrating responses to six FTC and state attorney general investigations/inquiries, including meetings, with no enforcement actions as a result.
The marketing materials, labeling and advertising for these products have included products related to skin care, rejuvenation, diet and personal health care and hygiene.
Eric also has a nationally renowned specialty in defending and analyzing the liability for component parts and component supplier manufacturers under U.S. product liability statutes and common law.
Eric also has extensive experience dealing with California’s Proposition 65 labeling requirements and litigation relating to those requirements, dealing with FDA matters relating to personal health care, and personal care products, and dealing with consumer and regulatory issues relating to several microbial germicide products.
He has also spoken and written articles on numerous medical device related topics, including:
- Sales Representatives in the Operating Room
- The Learned Intermediary Doctrine
- The Post Sale Duty to Warn
- Liabilities in the product supply chain, including indemnity and contribution involving medical devices manufactured by foreign defendants for U.S. suppliers
He has taken several device cases to trial and to defense verdicts. He has also prevailed on numerous summary judgment motions, including prevailing on the seminal case in federal court on inadmissibility of MDR reports in summary judgment proceedings, Skerl v. Arrow International, 202 F. Supp.2d 748 (2001). He has conducted all types of discovery in these cases, including over 75 plaintiff’s depositions, experts’ depositions, extensive preparation and defense of medical device company representatives for deposition and trial, extensive Daubert briefing and oral argument, extensive summary judgment briefing and oral argument, and extensive trial prep to the eve of trial in many cases.
Transportation & Logistics Bio
“Eric is an exceptional litigator, and his ability to wade through the “noise” associated with litigation to identify the key aspects of the matter at issue and then develop an effective and cost-effective defense strategy and related tactics separates him from 95% of the litigators we engage in other jurisdictions.” – Benesch client
Eric is Co-Chair of the firm’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group and a Vice Chair of the Litigation Group. Eric is a Past President of the Transportation Lawyers Association (TLA).
Under Eric’s leadership, Benesch was named Law Firm of the Year for 2025, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017, 2016 and 2014 in the area of Transportation Law by Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”. Only one law firm per practice area in the U.S. receives this recognition each year, making this award a particularly significant achievement. For the twelfth consecutive year (2014-2026), Benesch also received a national first-tier ranking in Transportation Law also by Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms.”
Eric is a member of the Ohio Foreign Commerce Association; the Association of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy; The Traffic Club of Cleveland; The Trucking Law Subcommittee of the American Bar Association; The Transportation Consumer Protection Council; the Conference of Freight Counsel; the Transportation Loss Prevention & Security Council; The Transportation Intermediaries Association; The National Tank Truck Carriers; The Association of Transportation Law Professionals; the International Warehouse Logistics Association; the Intermodal Association of North America; the Council on Litigation Management; and a regular attendee at the Air Transport Association freight claims seminar. He is also a member of the Defense Research Institute, Trucking Law Subcommittee; the Air Forwarders Association; the Customs Brokers Roundtable; the Specialty Carriers & Rigging Association and the Swedish American Chamber of Commerce.
Eric has litigated or arbitrated matters in 29 states, before state and federal trial and appellate courts in various jurisdictions, and before the Surface Transportation Board, the U.S. Court of Veterans Appeals, the United States Olympic Committee, the Better Business Bureau and the Federal Maritime Commission. Eric serves on the TLA’s committees on freight claims, motor carrier transportation, litigation, logistics and e-commerce. He received the TLA’s Distinguished Service Award for 2001.
Eric has experience in Warsaw Convention litigation matters, Carmack Amendment litigation, COGSA litigation, PUCO dealings, NHTSA matters and DOT and Surface Transportation Board matters. He also has general experience in air and surface freight disputes, freight intermediary issues and litigation, private fleet formation, truck sale and purchase issues, freight undercharge and over length disputes, admiralty litigation, freight loss and damage litigation, motor carrier casualty and personal injury work, regulatory and registration issues, driver leasing issues and general regulatory compliance matters.
Eric was listed by Super Lawyers as an Ohio Super Lawyer from 2004-2020. Super Lawyers also listed him as one of the top 100 lawyers in Ohio and, furthermore, one of the top 50 lawyers in Cleveland in 2008. From 2007-2023, Eric was also named as one of The Best Lawyers in America® and named Best Lawyers’ 2013 Cleveland Transportation Lawyer of the Year. Best Lawyers describes itself as the definitive guide to legal excellence in the United States.
Eric is a frequent speaker at industry seminars and has authored numerous articles on freight intermediary liability, carrier liability, broker defaults, shipper liability, freight loss and damage, improper loading and contractual liability. He also has experience in preparing and litigating transportation contracts.
In the course of his transportation-related legal work over the years, Eric has cultivated a diverse coterie of transportation industry experts across the country. These experts provide him with regular formal and informal consultation. This ongoing consult gives him valuable industry perspectives on the matters in which he is involved. It also serves as a helpful complement to his legal experience in these matters.
What I Do
Featured endorsements
Experience
Represented a global freight forward transportation dispute in the New Jersey Superior Court. After filing, fully briefing, and arguing a motion to dismiss, the Court found that the plaintiff had not stated a claim for which relief may be granted. Accordingly, the judge dismissed the complaint from the bench before the end of the hearing.
Represented C.A.T. Transport, Inc., a Canadian-based transportation provider focused on extensive and elaborate cross-border motor carrier transportation, in successfully managing the dismissal of over 20 lawsuits from a hundred-vehicle pileup in Texas.
Represented Johanson Transportation Service, a large nationwide transportation broker and logistics provider headquartered in California in a high profile, high value, multiple fatality lawsuit for Johanson in California. We obtained a complete dismissal.
Represented an industrial colorant manufacturer, Chroma Color Corporation, in connection with an insurance coverage dispute in the Western District of Wisconsin. The dispute arose after our client was sued in connection with alleged deficiencies in its ultraviolet protection products. The plaintiff used these products in molded parking lot light post bases and traffic bollards at large gas station chains. The plaintiff’s endgame was to seek damages in connection with every product installed at every single gas station with which it had a contract. Had the Court agreed with that theory, the damages figure would have reached eight figures in potential exposure.
Three insurers sought to extricate from defending our client in the underlying suit, and a number of cross-pleadings and amended cross-pleadings were filed as a result. After more than a year of active litigation on both the merits and on coverage, a testy and unsuccessful mediation, and a long stretch of dispositive briefing, we won summary judgment on coverage. Specifically, the Court found that the applicable insurance documents conferred coverage and also adopted our position that the insurers always had a duty to defend in the underlying litigation.
Represented a national manufacturer in a trio of cases in which the Plaintiffs began a concerted, multi-country effort to assert claims against our clients by alleging claims in Michigan state court and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, tortious interference, and civil conspiracy related to failure to pay an earnout in a Stock Purchase Agreement. Plaintiffs also named the individual directors and officers of our client as defendants. We filed multiple Motions for Summary Disposition for failure to state a claim and lack of personal jurisdiction in Michigan, which the court granted while holding others in abeyance pending the Canadian litigation. We also filed a third lawsuit in Delaware federal court alleging breach of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. As a result of this strategy by Benesch, the cases were settled with a settlement payment to our clients, despite Plaintiffs initially filing the lawsuit and seeking significant damages.
Eric Zalud has litigated personal injury, motor vehicle accidents, product liability, premises liability, and fire cases over the last several decades. He has litigated over 100 motor vehicle accident matters and litigated over 50 fatality cases. He has taken numerous of these cases to trial – and to defense verdicts. He has been involved in all aspects of the litigation, from pleadings to dispositive motions, to depositions, to expert witnesses, to many full-blown jury trials. Representative matters include:
- Mary R. Imrie, Estate of Jeremy Imrie v. Greenleaf Motor Express, Inc. (fatality case)
- Randy C. Goldsmith, et al. v. A.J. Weigand, Inc., et al. (premises liability/acid bath)
- Elizabeth Fox, et al. v. Valley Transportation, Inc. (fatality MVA)
- Nikki Puchta, et al. v. Penske Trucking, et al. (MVA with serious injuries)
- Willie Wade Jr., et al. v. Leader National Insurance Co. (MVA including bath faith claim; defense verdict)
- Y.Z. Traylor, et al. v. Trans States Lines, et al., United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio (MVA with serious injuries)
- Jerry W. Hazel, et al. v. Truck One, Inc., et al. (fatality MVA)
- Betty Gold v. Able Transit, Inc., et al. (MVA with serious injuries)
- David Schaffner, et al. v. Buckeye Wrecking & Transfer, Inc., et al. (premises liability)
- Univar USA, Inc. v. M.C. Tank Transport, Inc. (premises liability; hazmat spill)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Cargo Transporters, Inc., et al. (MVA with serious injuries)
- Wieslaw Wojtanowicz v. Hinds Trucking, Inc., et al. (MVA with serious injuries)
- Jonathan Colons v. Truly Blessed Trucking (MVA with serious injuries)
- Jesse Escamilla, Special Administrator of the Estate of Telesfora Escamilla, deceased v. Amazon.com, LLC., et al., Cook County Circuit Court of Illinois (fatality MVA)
- Sidney Hill v. Amazon.com, aka Amazon, et al., Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas (MVA with serious injuries)
- Corey A. Fowler, Administrator for the Estates of Ronald Balzer and Tamara Balzer v. STL Trucking, LLC, et al., St. Louis, Missouri Circuit Court (MVA fatality)
- Sandra Romig, Individually and Executrix of the Estate of Robert L. Romig, Jr. v. Baker Hi-Way Express, Inc., et al. (premises liability; fatality)
- Mutual Ins. Co. of America, et al. v. Royal Appliance MFG., Inc., United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (fire case; won on appeal)
- Carmen Cruz v. Western/Scott Fetzer Co., (work place/premises liability; complete dismissal)
- Jack White v. Fibreboard Corp., Knoxville, Tennessee Common Pleas Court (asbestos exposure; defense verdict)
Represented Cargill, Inc., a multi-billion-dollar food products processor and manufacturer, in a motor vehicle accident case pending in Cook County, Illinois. First, we succeeded in obtaining summary judgment on all of the plaintiff’s vicarious liability claims in a court long known as plaintiff friendly. The plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider that dismissal and a motion to amend the complaint to include direct negligence claims against Cargill for the loading of the cargo. We opposed the plaintiff’s motions, and the judge agreed, drafting a thoughtful written order denying plaintiffs’ motions in their entirety. Not only was this a huge win for Cargill, but it was also a win for the nation’s third-party logistics industry and manufacturers such as Cargill across the country.
Represented a New York-based ocean and air freight intermediary in two related actions against an international steamship line. During the height of the 2021 COVID-19 pandemic, the Line improperly in-gated five shipping containers owned by our client’s customer into its terminal. Despite our client’s attempts to reclaim the shipping containers, the Line continued to use the shipping containers in its own business for several years, in derogation of our client’s superior ownership rights. Ultimately, we filed a complaint for conversion in the United States District Court -Southern District of New York, and a companion action at the Federal Maritime Commission for damages related to the Line’s alleged violations of the Shipping Act. We successfully defended against motions to dismiss in both forums and litigated both actions through numerous motions, counterclaims, third-party pleading practice, and administrative proceedings. Ultimately, the parties were able to resolve these related disputes in a favorable global settlement.
Represented a state university in an alleged hazing fraternity lawsuit. Three days before the trial was to begin, the Court entered summary judgment in favor of our client. The case stemmed from the death of an 18-year-old freshman at the University. The student had been suspended from pledging the fraternity while under criminal investigation. During that suspension, he died off campus while inhaling nitrous oxide canisters. The court set new precedent regarding the state’s hazing statute’s affirmative defense. It also newly established that universities will not be liable under negligence theories if, despite diligent efforts, a student gets hazed. It vindicated our client’s employees, who were unfairly maligned in the public eye.
Represented a nationwide basement waterproofing company in a commercial arbitration proceeding involving allegations of improper use of a trade name, trade logos and slogans, in nationwide advertising. Claimant’s franchises/licensees alleged violations of the Lanham Act, which related to claims, statements, and methods implemented by client in its advertising, and violations of prior settlement agreements between the parties. After two years of discovery and a two-week arbitration hearing, we prevailed on all but one very nominal count.
Represented a half-billion-dollar global manufacturing company, in a lawsuit against an Israeli subcontractor who refused to authorize the release of several multimillion-dollar industrial scrubbers, due to a payment dispute. Client needed the equipment to satisfy its contractual obligations to one of its largest global customers, and was under pressure to resolve the dispute quickly. We moved for and successfully obtained a temporary restraining order in a U.S. court, based upon the purchase orders and website terms and conditions between the parties, which included a U.S. choice of forum clause. The order required the Israeli subcontractor to make the equipment available for pickup at its Israeli facility, on a priority basis.
As special counsel to the Ohio Attorney General, and lead private counsel for Ohio University, won a complete defense victory for Ohio University in a case stemming from the death of a student at an off-campus property. Set statewide precedent regarding statutory duties, as well as wrongful death and negligence claims owed by schools and universities.
Samuelson v. Durkee/French/Airwick and Thomas Havrilesko, 976 F.2D 1111 (7th Cir.) Affirming summary judgment in retaliatory discharge action.
U.S.A. Parking Systems, Inc. v. Penn-Lillis Corp., 1995 WL 601186 (Ohio App. 8th Dist.) Won summary judgment in commercial lease dispute.
The New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Marinemax of Ohio, Inc., 408 F.Supp. 2d, 526, 63 Fed.R. Serv. 3d 976, (N.D. Ohio) Summary judgment regarding marine policy coverage issues.
Tucker v. Interarms, 186 F.R.D. 450 (N.D. Ohio) Successfully handled international financial trust dispute resulting in dismissal of claims based on Inter-American Convention of Letters Rogatory.
Successfully litigated a case in which the plaintiff’s estate alleged that she had been entrapped and essentially suffocated by her nursing home bed rail.
In Donaca v. DISH Network L.L.C., No. 11-cv-02910, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19740 (D. Colo. Feb. 18, 2014), the class action defense team of Eric Zalud, Ben Kern, and David Krueger successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold DISH vicariously liable for 1+ million phone calls made by over a dozen third-parties in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b) and (c).
Participated in evaluation of options and actions for recalls or voluntary corrective actions for consumer and other products.
We obtained summary judgment in favor of Cybex, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of fitness equipment, based on our argument that the plaintiff provided insufficient evidence to demonstrate that our client manufactured defective equipment.
Louis Fodor, Trustee v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 1990 WL 93210 (Ohio App.) Commercial lease and occupancy issues regarding continuous use clause.
In Fitzhenry v. ADT Corp., No. 14-80180, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166243 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 3, 2014), the class action defense team of Eric Zalud, Ben Kern, and David Krueger successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold ADT vicariously liable for approximately 5 million phone calls made by an independent third-party in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b).
Successfully defended a medical device manufacturer in a lawsuit alleging defective design and breach of warranty regarding a surgical device used during a kidney transplant.
Prevailed in summary judgment in uninsured/undetermined vehicular liability coverage declaratory judgment action, establishing six figure coverage differential as the law of the case.
State ex re. Phillip J. Charvat, Relator v. Richard A. Frye, Judge, et al., 2006 WL 3240653 (Ohio App. 10 Dist.)
Domo v. Stouffer, 580 N.E.2d 788 (Ohio App. 6 Dist.) Corporate shareholder dispute.
Kenneth Talmon v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 1989 WL 157234 (Ohio App.) Affirming summary judgment on state lottery sweepstakes issues.
Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. v. D.J. Franzen, Inc., 2008 WL 3836535 (N.D. Ohio) Granting dismissal based upon federal Carmack Amendment preemption.
F.M. Machine Co. v. R&L Carriers, Inc., 2009 WL 175977 (N.D. Ohio), Fed. Carr. Cas. P. 84, 610 Partial summary judgment enforcing liability limitations of motor carrier.
Associates Insurance Co. v. Whittington, 170 F.Supp. 2d 1119 (N.D. Ohio) Trucking insurance coverage summary judgment victory.
Won at jury trial in a bad faith case seeking over $1,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, establishing precedent that prompted dismissals in two other related cases.
Prevailed on summary judgment and on appeal in a Tennessee case contesting the assertion of personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant, based solely upon its website activity.
GMS Management Company, Inc., et al. v. Pick-N-Pay Supermarkets, Inc., et al., 601 N.E.2d 72 (Ohio App. 11 Dist.) Affirming summary judgment on continuous use issues in commercial lease.
Won at jury trial in a case alleging $33 million in damages for allegedly defective glazed bricks in eight high rise apartment buildings.
Prevailed on summary judgment in a nationwide sales representative wrongful termination class action in which the plaintiffs alleged fraud, deceptive practices, breach of contract and unjust enrichment, and sought over $10,000,000.00 in damages
Successfully litigated a wrongful death action alleging malfunction of a perfusion medical device during open heart surgery.
Houmani v. Roadway Express, Inc., 2008 WL 731497 (N.D. Ohio) Freight loss and damage litigation; prevailed on summary judgment.
Represented insured trucking company in an excess insurance scenario and successfully orchestrated multi-million dollar settlement under policy limits in dual injury amputation case.
Ferron v. 411 Web Directory, et al., 2010 WL 1817396 (S.D. Ohio) Granting summary judgment on consumer claims regarding e-mail advertising under Consumer Sales Practices Act.
Automated Window Machinery, Inc. v. McKay Insurance Agency, Inc., 320 F.Supp. 619, Fed. Corr. Cas. P. 84, 343 (N.D. Ohio) Granting dismissal on federal Carmack Amendment preemption grounds.
Granting summary judgment on Learned Intermediary Doctrine and proximate cause in medical device case.
Stradiot Specialty, Inc. v. American Calendar Company, Inc., 2007 WL 1881309 (Ohio App. 11 Dist.) Handled issues relating to personal jurisdiction as between similar actions in two states; affirming jurisdictional judgment.
Hammod v. Alekna Construction, Inc., et al., 269 A.D. 773, 703 N.Y.S.2d 332 (N.Y.A.D. 4 2000) Sick building case, alleged multiple chemical sensitivity; dismissal affirmed.
DWC Company v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 2009 WL 150671 (S.D. Ohio) Removal approved based upon 28 U.S.C § 1337’s “other paper” language.
Served on the product safety committee of publicly traded global consumer product manufacturer.
Charvat v. Dish TV Now, Inc., et al., 2008 WL 1886311 (Ohio App. 10 Dist.) Affirming ruling that Consumer Sales Practices Act does not govern a settlement agreement.
Authored the warnings and instructions for lawn care products, household cleaning products, medical device products and vehicular products, all of which are presently on the market
We defended our client, Robert Bosch Corporation, one of the world’s largest automotive component manufacturers, in toxic tort/asbestos litigation in the United States. We were able to dismiss the claims in their entirety.
Won at jury trial on behalf of subcontractor seeking payment for verbal extras and change orders on shopping center construction project.
Trident Trust Company (UK) Ltd. v. Anglo-American Credit Union, Inc. et al., 2008 WL 509314, (S.D. Ohio)
Terminal Warehouse, Inc. v. CSX Transp., Inc., Fed. Corr. Cos. P. 85,442 (6th Cir.) Appeal of Surface Transportation Board decision as to railroad abandonment.
Walter H. Caplan v. Judy Caplan, 2002 WL 33001393 (Ohio Com. Pl.) Tortious interference with expectancy of inheritance issues; prevailed on summary judgment.
Won complete reversal of multimillion dollar personal injury verdict as newly appointed appellate counsel in Pennsylvania case involving amputation.
Won jury trial in a commercial dispute regarding construction materials, in which we successfully pierced the corporate veil and obtained judgment against individual and related corporate defendants, along with prejudgment interest, punitive damages, and all attorneys fees
Louis Fodor v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 1993 WL 526660 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.) Commercial lease issues regarding continuous operation clause.
Mutual Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., 112 Fed. Appx. 386 (6th Cir.) Applying rebuttable presumption of no liability to manufacturer based upon compliance with state and federal safety standards.
Successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of Dish Network LLC in two lawsuits and a dismissal of all claims in two other cases brought under the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Purchased Parts Group, Inc. v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., 2000 WL 33125340 (Tenn. App.) Upheld order dismissing manufacturer for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Mid-West Materials, Inc. v. Packard Logistics, Inc., 2007 WL 893890 (N.D. Ohio) Summary judgment dismissal; Carmack Amendment federal preemption.
Halpern v. Atlas Van Lines, 2009 WL 484202 (N.D. Ohio) Partial summary judgment, and awarding sanctions and fees.
First National Supermarkets, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., 661 N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.) Stock brokerage indemnity issues.
Successfully litigated a nursing home case involving a resident who had “eloped” to grounds outside the facility and froze to death.
Successfully litigated a wrongful death claim for nitrogen asphyxiation by a “nitrogen blanket” in a tank truck.
Successfully litigated an intentional tort claim for full body burns from a fall into a tank wash acid bath.
Smeltzer, et al. v. Binsley, et al., 2007 WL 397336, Ohio App. 9. Dist., No. 23092, 2007
Shonac Corporation v. Maersk, Inc. 159 F.Supp. 1020, 2001 A.M.C. 1924 (S.D. Ohio) Summary judgment regarding damages recoverable in a COGSA maritime case.
Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Check Mate Priority Services, 2008 WL 2252533 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.) Dismissed claims based upon personal jurisdiction issues relating to contractual choice of forum clause.
Prevailed in a summary judgment proceeding R&L Carriers in a freight loss and damage case alleging significant damages to freight in transit, we prevailed in a summary judgment proceeding for our client, R&L Carriers, a nationwide less-than-truckload motor carrier, based on appropriate application of contractual and bill of lading liability limitations.
Prevailed on summary judgment in a sick building case in which seven plaintiffs claimed they had contracted multiple chemical sensitivity.
Charvat v. Echostar Satellite, LLC, 676 F.Supp. 549 (S.D. Ohio) Granting summary judgment on consumer claim under Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Brennan v. A-A Auto Transport, Inc., 2007 WL 2886355 (N.D. Ohio) Motion for Judgment on the pleadings granted; federal Carmack Amendment preemption.
Fodor, Trustee of Biddulph Plaza Shopping Center v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 589 N.E.2d 17 (Ohio Supreme Court) Commercial lease issues regarding continuous operations clause.
Samuelson v. Durkee/French/Airwick, et al., 701 F.Supp. 729 (N.D. Indiana) Summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s Title VII and retaliation claims.
We obtained Motion for Summary Judgment in Ferron v. DISH Network, LLC and EManagement, dismissing, with prejudice, several hundred Ohio Consumer Sales Practice Act (CSPA) claims against our client, DISH Network, LLC.
Carr v. Olympian Moving & Storage, Fed. Carr Cas. P. 84, 459 (N.D. Ohio) Dismissal on complete federal Carmack Amendment preemption grounds.
Won at jury trial in international freight charge dispute involving global transport of tunnel boring equipment.
Won at jury trial in multimillion dollar toxic tort exposure case.
Won at jury trial in high-dollar international freight claim trial involving alleged damage to geodesic dome.
Won at jury trial in seven figure construction contract dispute regarding defective foundational and structural issues.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- Associate Editor, Journal of Transnational Law
- Associate Justice, Moot Court
- International Court of Justice
- Diplomacy and Foreign Affairs
- cum laude
Clerkships and Bar Admissions
More
- Immediate Past President, Transportation Lawyers Association
- Member, Air Forwarders Association
- Member, Association of Transportation Law Professionals
- Member, Association for Transportation Law Logistics & Policy
- Member, Cleveland Trucking Association
- Member, Council on Litigation Management
- Member, Customs Brokers Roundtable
- Member, Diversity Law Institute
- Member, Intermodal Association of North America
- Member, International Association of Defense Counsel
- Member, International Warehouse Logistics Association
- Member, Litigation Counsel of America
- Member, Medmarc Medical Device Liability Defense Panel
- Member, National Home Delivery Association
- Member, National Tank Truck Carriers
- Member, Ohio Foreign Commerce Association
- Member, Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association
- Member, Swedish American Chamber of Commerce
- Member, TIDA Judicial Fairness Committee
- Member, The Conference of Freight Counsel
- Member, The Defense Research Institute, Trucking Law Subcommittee
- Member, The Traffic Club of Cleveland
- Member, The Transportation Consumer Protection Council
- Member, The Transportation Loss Prevention & Security Council
- Member, Transportation Intermediaries Association
- Member, Trucking Industry Defense Association
- Member, Truckload Carriers Association
- Member, Transload Distribution Association of North America
- Member, Trial Law Institute
- Ranked Band 2 Nationally for Transportation: Road (Carriage/Logistics), Chambers 2020-2025
- Listed, The Best Lawyers in America®, Transportation Law and Commercial Litigation, 2007-2026
- Named The Best Lawyers in America© Cleveland Transportation Lawyer of the Year, 2013
- Listed, Ohio Super Lawyers, Transportation/Maritime, 2004-2026
- Senior Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America
- Listed, Benchmark Litigation, Litigation Star, 2024-2026
Related News & Insights
Watch Your T&Cs! When Done Right, Terms and Conditions are Both Viable—And Valuable
The era of the paper/hard copy bill of lading and/or rate confirmation is fading fast. Hard copies and paper do live on in various shipment schematics; however, increasingly, and at a very rapid rate, transactions between shippers, carriers, brokers and forwarders are conducted by, and memorialized in, electronic form via email, interactive website access and response, and—more and more—AI mechanisms.
Thought Leader Wrap-Up | Fifth Annual Investing in the Transportation & Logistics Industry Conference
Key Takeaways Happy New Year! At the end of 2025, Benesch’s Trade Secret, Restrictive Covenants and Unfair Competition Group fielded …
FreightWaves Highlights Benesch’s Annual Investing in the Transportation & Logistics Industry Conference
FreightWaves highlighted the firm’s annual Benesch Investing in the Transportation & Logistics Industry Conference in an article examining why 2026 …
Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Group Featured in Crain’s Executive Insights on Global Supply Chain Transformation
Benesch’s nationally recognized Transportation & Logistics Practice Group is prominently featured in the latest Crain’s Executive Insights roundtable, “Navigating Global …