Michael D. Meuti
Chair, Appellate Practice Group
Overview
In the world of high-stakes litigation, most lawyers see a battle. Michael Meuti sees a chess match. He is a seasoned trial and appellate litigator who helps businesses and individuals navigate high-stakes disputes with precision and purpose. He crafts strategies that dismantle multimillion-dollar threats and uncover paths to victory where others see a dead end.
He proved it when his novel legal theory salvaged a half-billion-dollar claim for a client. He proved it again when he took an eight-figure class-action demand and methodically dismantled it, forcing a settlement for a fraction of the cost. Known for his strategic mindset, creative problem-solving and relentless focus on efficiency, Michael approaches litigation as both an intellectual challenge and an opportunity to outthink the opposition, finding the smartest, most direct path to victory.
This track record of delivering results is why Crain’s Cleveland Business named him a 2025 Notable Litigator. Michael brings this same intensity to every challenge, whether it’s representing clients in the retail, energy and healthcare sectors, or fighting for justice in his pro bono work against unconstitutional laws and discrimination.
As chair of Benesch’s Appellate Practice Group, Michael’s work has national impact. Honed through trial and appellate clerkships and as the Simon Karas Fellow in the Ohio Solicitor General’s Office, his strategic vision secures precedent-setting victories that neutralize threats not only to his clients, but to entire industries.
Outside the courtroom, Michael is passionate about mentoring associates in legal writing, staying active through resistance training, and camping with his daughters as part of the Cuyahoga Valley Native Sons & Daughters program. He believes that cultivating both a sharp mind and meaningful personal connections is essential to success—in and out of the courtroom.
*Matter completed prior to joining Benesch.
What I Do
Experience
Persuaded two different courts that California Civil Code section 1670.8 (the “Yelp Law”) does not provide a private right of action where the allegedly unlawful terms were not threatened to be enforced against the plaintiff, in a case where plaintiffs were seeking $2,500-$5,000 per website visitor.
Represented sitting U.S. Senator in amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in “Bridgegate” case.
In intermediate Ohio appellate court, represents residents of small town challenging local ordinance permitting residents to carry handguns to city council meetings in violation of Ohio statute prohibiting firearms in buildings in which a courtroom is located.
Represented global technology company in trade-secret-theft investigations involving former employees.
Represents individual in government False Claims Act investigation.
Represented an international developer and manufacturer of high-temperature industrial materials in environmental class action brought by group of residents and landowners.
Represented Ohio utility pursuing constitutional challenge to competing public utility’s business practices, in intermediate appellate court and Ohio Supreme Court. Achieved reversal of the trial court’s opinion.
Represented green-energy company in putative class action pursuing land-use claims.
Represents manufacturer in Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act matter.
Represented a chain-restaurant franchisee as plaintiff in a civil RICO class action seeking recovery for overcharges by its supplier. Drafted successful class certification briefs before the case was resolved with a nine-figure settlement.*
Represented landowner in dispute with tenant over exercise of a purchase option.
Represented financial institution in dispute with another financial institution regarding a mortgage-loan sale.
Represented aerospace service provider in customer dispute. Successfully resolved matter without litigation.
Represented apparel designer and importer in copyright litigation.
Represented REIT in litigation concerning an easement. Achieved victory in both trial court and Ohio Court of Appeals.
On behalf of telehealth provider, defeated RICO claim asserted by competitor.
Represents officers of company in parallel state and federal class actions alleging violations of the securities laws.
Drafted amicus brief to Washington State Supreme Court addressing whether consumer-protection statutes support claims for price-gouging during a pandemic.
Represented an auto insurer in class-action litigation addressing the insurer’s obligation to pay title and license fees in total-loss claims; defeated motion for class certification.
Achieved reversals of lower-court decisions refusing to enforce a telehealth company’s arbitration clause in intermediate courts of appeal in New Jersey and Florida, as well as the Sixth Circuit.
Represents officers of company in mass arbitration asserting consumer-protection claims against company and its officers.
In the New Jersey Supreme Court, achieved reversal of a lower-court decision holding that N.J. Consumer Fraud Act plaintiffs state a claim by alleging that the retailer advertised a false discount.
Defeated class certification on behalf of telehealth company in false-advertising case, convincing court that individualized questions regarding injury and damages precluded class treatment and that class plaintiffs’ damages and consumer-survey experts’ opinions were not reliable.
Represented a federal credit union in a bet-the-company class action under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Developed the counterclaim strategy that resolved the case favorably before class certification briefing.*
Represented clients in multiple Federal Trade Commission investigations into marketing practices.*
Represented an Ohio teleservices company in a bet-the-company consumer class action alleging fraud. Drafted major briefs, including the brief opposing class certification.*
Represented auto insurers in consumer class actions in California state court.*
Represented a financial institution in consumer class action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Drafted successful opposition to class certification.*
Represented as lead counsel a developer of youth-sports parks in a commercial dispute. Achieved full victory for the client in federal district court and preserved that victory on appeal.*
Represented a major grocery chain in class-action antitrust litigation against a dairy cooperative and a dairy processor. Drafted the brief successfully opposing summary judgment.*
Represented a Fortune 50 corporation in a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act matter including dozens of depositions, extensive motion practice, and two multiweek trials.*
Represented a company and a national nonprofit organization in parallel putative class actions alleging violations of state and federal telephone privacy statutes.*
Represented an incarcerated habeas petitioner on appeal, after district court denied his pro se habeas petition on procedural grounds. Achieved unanimous reversal of the district court’s decision.*
Represented a public corporation in contract dispute with a former parent company regarding employee-benefit liabilities. Deposed the plaintiff company’s chief financial officer, its general counsel and seven other witnesses, and drafted all major briefs.*
Represented manufacturer in litigation arising out of construction project and successfully resolved the matter early in litigation.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- Executive Editor, Stanford Law Review
- summa cum laude
- Outstanding Graduate for the College of Business Administration
Clerkships and Bar Admissions
More
- Member, Federal Bar Association (FBA)
- John M. Manos Inn of Court (2011-2022)
- American Constitution Society
- Northeast Ohio Lawyer Chapter
- Immediate Past President (2017-2024)
- President (2014-2016)
- Vice President (2011-2013)
- Washington, D.C. Lawyer Chapter: Executive Board Member (2009-2010)
- Columbus Lawyer Chapter: Founding Member and Steering Committee Co-Chair (2007-2008)
- San Francisco Lawyer Chapter: Active Member (2005-2006)
- Stanford Law School Chapter: Founding Member and Steering Committee Chair (2001-2003)
- Northeast Ohio Lawyer Chapter
- Case Western Reserve Law School: Adjunct Professor, Appellate Practice (2018-2020)
- Recipient, Crain’s Cleveland Business 2025 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys Award
Related News & Insights
Not Quite Full of It: The Risk of “Shrinkflation” Lawsuits
Key Takeaways: As companies grapple with inflation, many are forced to reduce product volume while keeping prices and packaging the …
Using the Funnel—Folgers’ Decision Key To Avoiding Certified False-Advertising Classes
Key Takeaways: The Eighth Circuit clarified that even when a state’s false-advertising law does not require reliance, plaintiffs must still …
Protecting Your Company from the Silliest Lawsuit Not on Your Radar
Key Takeaways A growing wave of lawsuits is targeting companies under a California statute originally intended to protect consumer reviews …
Cashing In On Preemption: Kalshi Lawsuits Preview the Future of Gambling Regulations
Key Takeaways KalshiEx, LLC (“Kalshi”) is betting on its own future. The U.S. exchange company operates as a designated contract …