Michael D. Meuti
Chair, Appellate Practice Group
Overview
In the world of high-stakes litigation, most lawyers see a battle. Michael Meuti sees a chess match. He is a seasoned trial and appellate litigator who helps businesses and individuals navigate high-stakes disputes with precision and purpose. He crafts strategies that dismantle multimillion-dollar threats and uncover paths to victory where others see a dead end.
He proved it when his novel legal theory salvaged a half-billion-dollar claim for a client. He proved it again when he took an eight-figure class-action demand and methodically dismantled it, forcing a settlement for a fraction of the cost. Known for his strategic mindset, creative problem-solving and relentless focus on efficiency, Michael approaches litigation as both an intellectual challenge and an opportunity to outthink the opposition, finding the smartest, most direct path to victory.
This track record of delivering results is why Crain’s Cleveland Business named him a 2025 Notable Litigator. Michael brings this same intensity to every challenge, whether it’s representing clients in the retail, energy and healthcare sectors, or fighting for justice in his pro bono work against unconstitutional laws and discrimination.
As chair of Benesch’s Appellate Practice Group, Michael’s work has national impact. Honed through trial and appellate clerkships and as the Simon Karas Fellow in the Ohio Solicitor General’s Office, his strategic vision secures precedent-setting victories that neutralize threats not only to his clients, but to entire industries.
Outside the courtroom, Michael is passionate about mentoring associates in legal writing, staying active through resistance training, and camping with his daughters as part of the Cuyahoga Valley Native Sons & Daughters program. He believes that cultivating both a sharp mind and meaningful personal connections is essential to success—in and out of the courtroom.
*Matter completed prior to joining Benesch.
What I Do
Experience
Represented a national retailer before the Washington Supreme Court in a class action challenging reference prices in product markdowns. The team successfully argued that alleging a false reference price does not satisfy the injury requirement under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, setting precedent that significantly limits retailer exposure to similar claims.
In the New Jersey Supreme Court, achieved reversal of a lower-court decision holding that N.J. Consumer Fraud Act plaintiffs state a claim by alleging that the retailer advertised a false discount.
Briefed and argued to Washington Supreme Court case presenting issue whether alleging a false discount satisfies the Washington Consumer Protection Act’s injury element. Awaiting decision.
Persuaded two different courts that California Civil Code section 1670.8 (the “Yelp Law”) does not provide a private right of action where the allegedly unlawful terms were not threatened to be enforced against the plaintiff, in a case where plaintiffs were seeking $2,500–$5,000 per website visitor. Representing both clients on appeal.
Represents consumer brand in false-advertising class action under California consumer-protection statutes. Won motion to dismiss.
Represents officers of company in mass arbitration asserting consumer-protection claims against company and its officers.
Defeated class certification on behalf of telehealth company in false-advertising case seeking hundreds of millions of dollars. Convinced court that individualized questions regarding injury and damages precluded class treatment and that class plaintiffs’ damages and that consumer survey experts’ opinions were not reliable.
Defeated class certification for an auto insurer in class-action litigation addressing the insurer’s obligation to pay title and license fees in total-loss claims.
Represented prominent trade organization as amicus to Washington State Supreme Court in case addressing whether consumer-protection statutes support claims for price-gouging during a pandemic.
On behalf of telehealth provider, defeated Lanham Act and RICO claims asserted by competitor seeking nine-figure damage award.
Achieved reversals of lower-court decisions refusing to enforce a telehealth company’s arbitration clause in intermediate courts of appeal in New Jersey and Florida, as well as the Sixth Circuit.
Represented officers and directors of company in parallel state and federal class actions alleging violations of the securities laws.
Represents former officers and directors of company in case brought by bankruptcy trustee alleging breaches of fiduciary duties.
Represented clients in multiple Federal Trade Commission investigations into marketing practices.*
Represented an Ohio teleservices company in a bet-the-company consumer class action alleging fraud. Drafted major briefs, including the brief opposing class certification.*
Represented auto insurers in consumer class actions in California state court.*
Represented a financial institution in consumer class action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Drafted successful opposition to class certification.*
Represented a federal credit union in a bet-the-company class action under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Developed the counterclaim strategy that resolved the case favorably before class certification briefing.*
Represented a Fortune 50 corporation in a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act matter including dozens of depositions, extensive motion practice, and two multiweek trials.*
Represented an international developer and manufacturer of high-temperature industrial materials in environmental class action brought by group of residents and landowners.
Represented Ohio utility pursuing constitutional challenge to competing public utility’s business practices, in intermediate appellate court and Ohio Supreme Court. Achieved reversal of the trial court’s opinion.
Represented green-energy company in putative class action pursuing land-use claims.
Represented REIT in litigation concerning an easement. Achieved victory in both trial court and Ohio Court of Appeals.
Represented as lead counsel a developer of youth-sports parks in a commercial dispute. Achieved full victory for the client in federal district court and preserved that victory on appeal.*
Represented a chain-restaurant franchisee as plaintiff in a civil RICO class action seeking recovery for overcharges by its supplier. Drafted successful class certification briefs before the case was resolved with a nine-figure settlement.*
Represented a major grocery chain in class-action antitrust litigation against a dairy cooperative and a dairy processor. Drafted the brief successfully opposing summary judgment.*
Represented a company and a national nonprofit organization in parallel putative class actions alleging violations of state and federal telephone privacy statutes.*
Represented global technology company in trade-secret-theft investigations involving former employees.
Represents individual in federal civil-rights case seeking redress for religious and national-origin discrimination in public accommodation.
Represented sitting U.S. Senator in amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in “Bridgegate” case.
In intermediate Ohio appellate court, represented residents of small town challenging local ordinance permitting residents to carry handguns to city council meetings in violation of Ohio statute prohibiting firearms in buildings in which a courtroom is located.
Represented an incarcerated habeas petitioner on appeal, after district court denied his pro se habeas petition on procedural grounds. Achieved unanimous reversal of the district court’s decision.*
No results found
Credentials
Education
- Executive Editor, Stanford Law Review
- Outstanding Graduate for the College of Business Administration
Bar & Court Admissions
More
- Member, Federal Bar Association (FBA)
- John M. Manos Inn of Court (2011-2022)
- American Constitution Society
- Northeast Ohio Lawyer Chapter
- Immediate Past President (2017-2024)
- President (2014-2016)
- Vice President (2011-2013)
- Washington, D.C. Lawyer Chapter: Executive Board Member (2009-2010)
- Columbus Lawyer Chapter: Founding Member and Steering Committee Co-Chair (2007-2008)
- San Francisco Lawyer Chapter: Active Member (2005-2006)
- Stanford Law School Chapter: Founding Member and Steering Committee Chair (2001-2003)
- Northeast Ohio Lawyer Chapter
- Case Western Reserve Law School: Adjunct Professor, Appellate Practice (2018-2020)
- Recipient, Crain’s Cleveland Business 2025 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys Award
Related News & Insights
Five Stars, Zero Tolerance: FTC Turns Up Enforcement Under Consumer Review Rule
The Federal Trade Commission has made one point decidedly clear: the Consumer Review and Testimonials Rule is not a background compliance issue—it is an active enforcement priority.
What’s in a Name?: Courts Refuse to Stretch Product Names into Promises
Courts are making clear that a consumer’s subjective interpretation of a product’s name isn’t enough to support a false-advertising claim. Instead, those claims fail unless the seller made a statement that would mislead a reasonable consumer.
Benesch Secures Major Victory for Retailers in the Washington Supreme Court
Benesch secured a significant victory in the Washington Supreme Court for retailers and e-commerce businesses facing class-action litigation under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA).
California Food Fight: The SF City Attorney’s Snack Attack
The White House acted swiftly as promised following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to strike down tariffs implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The President signed a new Executive Order
Speaking & Events
Past Events
Avoiding Certification of False Advertising Classes: Building Defense Strategies Based on the Advertising Funnel | Michael D. Meuti, Michael B. Silverstein, Ruddy S. Abam
Go West…and Lawyer Up! Recent Trends in Consumer Litigation on the West Coast | Kennedy Dickson, Mark S. Eisen, Andrew J. Jarzyna, David M. Krueger, Michael D. Meuti
Stay Classy America: Class Action Trends in the Last 12 Months | Michael D. Meuti
New York, NY
Legal Issues Surrounding AI | Michael D. Meuti
Akron, OH
“Tweets,” “Likes,” and “Scrapes” in Litigation | Michael D. Meuti
Washington, DC
Hope & Redemption: Fighting for Equity in America’s Legal System | Michael D. Meuti
Cleveland, OH
OT 2020 Supreme Court Term Review and OT 2021 Term Preview | Michael D. Meuti
Cleveland, OH
2020 Supreme Court Term Review | Michael D. Meuti
Supreme Court Tolling Order | Michael D. Meuti
Cleveland Federal Bar Association’s Annual Supreme Court Term Review | Michael D. Meuti
Cleveland, OH