Client Alerts & Insights
The Paycheck Protection Program Loan Forgiveness Application
May 18, 2020
Authored By:
On May 15 2020, the SBA released the The Paycheck Protection Program Loan Forgiveness Application. We address some of the highlights of the application below.
- For administrative efficiency, if a borrower received proceeds of a loan in the middle of a pay period and processes payroll bi-weekly (i.e. 26 pays per year) or more frequently the borrower can calculate its payroll costs staring on the first day of the first full pay period after the loan was funded. This is known in the application as the “Alternative Payroll Covered Period”
Note that if a client uses the Alternative Payroll Covered Period to calculate payroll costs it still must use the regular Covered Period (i.e. first 8 weeks after the loan was funded) to calculate the following:
a. Interest payments
b. Rent and lease payments
c. Utility Payments
If the borrower uses the Alternative Payroll Covered Period to calculate payroll costs, it must also use the same period to calculate FTEs and salary/hourly wage reductions. - To the extent non-payroll costs (i.e. rent, interest or utilities) are incurred during the Covered Period, but the bill for such amount is not due until after the Covered Period, the amount can still be forgiven as long as the amount is paid before the next regular billing date.
- Payroll costs incurred during the borrower’s last pay period, but not paid by the end of the Covered Period or the Alternative Payroll Covered Period, as applicable, can still be forgiven if paid on or before the next regular payroll date. This means that borrowers do not have to run a special payroll.
- FTEs are calculated based on a 40 hour work week and the calculation is done to the tenth of an hour and on a per employee basis.
- No single employee can count as more than one FTE. This means if a person worked over 40 hours per week, they still count as one employee.
- For administrative efficiency, borrower’s may designate anyone who worked less than 40 hours a week as one half of an FTE.
- When determining if the forgiveness amount is reduced due to salary or wage reduction of more than 25%, you compare average salary/hour wages between 1/1/20 and 3/31/20 to average salary of hourly wages during the Covered Period or Alternative Payroll Covered Period.
- FTE count does not have to be reduced for any of the following reasons:
a. an employee was fired for cause;
b. an employee voluntarily resigned;
c. an employee voluntarily requested and received a reduction in their hours; or
d. an employer offered in writing to re-hire an employee, but the employee refused the offer - If the borrower reduced FTEs during 2/15/20 through 4/26/20 and as calculated on June 30th, the borrower has the same number of FTEs it did during borrower’s pay period that included February 15th, the forgiveness amount will not be reduced as result of lower number of FTEs.
Page 10 of the application contains a detailed description of the documentation that needs to be submitted for forgiveness. Note that documentation must be retained for 6 years from the date the loan is forgiven.
If you have any questions, please contact a member of Benesch’s Commercial Finance & Banking Practice Group.
Matthew P. Delguyd at mdelguyd@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4627.
Logan Bryant at lbryant@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6217.
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this Client Alert, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by the CDC and local officials.

Latest News
FTC Enforcement Trends in 2026: What Businesses, Advertisers Should Be Watching Now
Regulators continue to signal a return to core consumer‑friendly principles through new rulemaking initiatives, and recent enforcement activity, warning letters, and public commentary offer a practical preview of where scrutiny is likely to concentrate in 2026…
IEEPA Tariffs – Top Five Q&A for Supply Chains after U.S. Supreme Court Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision regarding tariffs Friday. The Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs according to the 6-3 decision…
Watch Your T&Cs! When Done Right, Terms and Conditions are Both Viable—And Valuable
The era of the paper/hard copy bill of lading and/or rate confirmation is fading fast. Hard copies and paper do live on in various shipment schematics; however, increasingly, and at a very rapid rate, transactions between shippers, carriers, brokers and forwarders are conducted by, and memorialized in, electronic form via email, interactive website access and response, and—more and more—AI mechanisms.
The Long Tail of the Opioid Crisis: How AGs Continue to Pursue Manufacturers, Distributors, Pharmacies
The opioid crisis has been a perennial priority for state attorneys general, and was the marquis priority for the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) in both 2023 (under OH AG Dave Yost) and 2025 (under NH AG John Formella). Recently, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the conclusion of a multistate effort to secure the bankruptcy reorganization plan for Purdue Pharma (Purdue).