Client Alerts & Insights
U.S. Department of Labor Offers Guidance on COVID-19 Wage Related Issues
March 13, 2020
Authored By:
Benesch Law’s Labor and Employment group recently wrote on general labor and employment related concerns relative to COVID-19 in an article published on March 6, 2020. In just the last seven days, thousands of additional cases have been announced, and the WHO officially termed the COVID-19 outbreak a “pandemic,” and the CDC agrees. Moreover, flights from Europe will be extremely limited over the next month, a number of governors have taken steps to ban “mass meetings,” religious services have in some areas been indefinitely suspended, the NBA, MLB, the NHL, MLS, and the NCAA have canceled or indefinitely suspended their seasons. Just today, President Trump announced a national emergency over the COVID-19 outbreak.
Given the rapidly developing nature of the COVID-19 outbreak and its effect on our global society, including global markets and the employers who drive them, the Department of Labor recently offered guidance on dealing with potential wage-related issues that employers may soon face, if they haven’t already. A few of the highlights include:
Volunteer Workers
If your business experiences a shortage of workers and is looking to volunteer help, be aware that covered, non-exempt workers working for private, for-profit employers have to be paid at least the minimum wage and cannot truly “volunteer” their services.
Termination of Employment
If you choose to lay off members of your workforce or to terminate employees in the face of economic headwinds, be mindful of your state’s wage payment laws, some of which may require immediate payment of all wages, including fringe benefits like accrued but unused vacation time.
Hours Worked/Hours Paid
If an employer is unable to provide work to non-exempt employees, federal labor law does not require the employer to pay the non-exempt employee for time spent not working. Actual hours worked, of course, must be compensated. Rules for compensating exempt employees are not as straightforward and should be discussed with counsel prior to implementing any pay reduction policies.
Employees Under Quarantine
Consistent with our March 6th alert, the Department of Labor recommends that employers be accommodating and flexible with workers impacted by government or employer imposed quarantines. Employers are encouraged to offer alternative work arrangements, such as teleworking, and additional paid time off opportunities.
Changing Job Descriptions
Federal labor law does not limit the type of work employees over the age of 18 may be required to perform, regardless of what the employee’s job description may say. In the event you believe employees may be required to perform tasks not normally associated with their work, work closely with human resources and consult your union contract before implementing any changes.
OSHA Standards and Teleworking
OSHA does not regulate “telework” in home offices. However, if an employer is required to keep records of work-related injuries and illnesses, those employers are required to keep such records related to home office injuries and illnesses. And, an employee having to stay away from work because of contracting COVID-19 may be a recordable lost-time injury and a compensable under a state’s workers’ compensation laws when an employee’s work requires contact with individuals with the disease.
As we indicated on March 6th, Benesch Law, including Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group, stands ready to assist with any questions as we closely follow COVID-19 developments and support our clients’ response efforts in the labor and employment and other relevant areas.
Joseph N. Gross at jgross@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4163;
Joseph R. Blalock at jblalock@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9359.
Benesch, including Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group, stands ready to assist with any questions as we closely follow COVID-19 developments and support our clients’ response efforts in all areas of their business. For more information relating to COVID-19, please see:
Client Bulletins | March 13, 2020
U.S. Department of Labor Offers Guidance on COVID-19 Wage Related Issues
Client Bulletins | March 06, 2020
COVID-19: Focus on Employment Law Considerations
Client Bulletins | March 02, 2020
COVID-19: Health and Legal Considerations Convene
Client Bulletins | February 21, 2020
Reduction and Exemption of Chinese Employer’s Contribution to Social Insurance
Client Bulletins | February 13, 2020
2019-nCoV Outbreak and Related Legal Concerns for Enterprises in China
Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.