Client Alerts & Insights
U.S. Department of Labor Offers Guidance on COVID-19 Wage Related Issues
March 13, 2020
Authored By:
Benesch Law’s Labor and Employment group recently wrote on general labor and employment related concerns relative to COVID-19 in an article published on March 6, 2020. In just the last seven days, thousands of additional cases have been announced, and the WHO officially termed the COVID-19 outbreak a “pandemic,” and the CDC agrees. Moreover, flights from Europe will be extremely limited over the next month, a number of governors have taken steps to ban “mass meetings,” religious services have in some areas been indefinitely suspended, the NBA, MLB, the NHL, MLS, and the NCAA have canceled or indefinitely suspended their seasons. Just today, President Trump announced a national emergency over the COVID-19 outbreak.
Given the rapidly developing nature of the COVID-19 outbreak and its effect on our global society, including global markets and the employers who drive them, the Department of Labor recently offered guidance on dealing with potential wage-related issues that employers may soon face, if they haven’t already. A few of the highlights include:
Volunteer Workers
If your business experiences a shortage of workers and is looking to volunteer help, be aware that covered, non-exempt workers working for private, for-profit employers have to be paid at least the minimum wage and cannot truly “volunteer” their services.
Termination of Employment
If you choose to lay off members of your workforce or to terminate employees in the face of economic headwinds, be mindful of your state’s wage payment laws, some of which may require immediate payment of all wages, including fringe benefits like accrued but unused vacation time.
Hours Worked/Hours Paid
If an employer is unable to provide work to non-exempt employees, federal labor law does not require the employer to pay the non-exempt employee for time spent not working. Actual hours worked, of course, must be compensated. Rules for compensating exempt employees are not as straightforward and should be discussed with counsel prior to implementing any pay reduction policies.
Employees Under Quarantine
Consistent with our March 6th alert, the Department of Labor recommends that employers be accommodating and flexible with workers impacted by government or employer imposed quarantines. Employers are encouraged to offer alternative work arrangements, such as teleworking, and additional paid time off opportunities.
Changing Job Descriptions
Federal labor law does not limit the type of work employees over the age of 18 may be required to perform, regardless of what the employee’s job description may say. In the event you believe employees may be required to perform tasks not normally associated with their work, work closely with human resources and consult your union contract before implementing any changes.
OSHA Standards and Teleworking
OSHA does not regulate “telework” in home offices. However, if an employer is required to keep records of work-related injuries and illnesses, those employers are required to keep such records related to home office injuries and illnesses. And, an employee having to stay away from work because of contracting COVID-19 may be a recordable lost-time injury and a compensable under a state’s workers’ compensation laws when an employee’s work requires contact with individuals with the disease.
As we indicated on March 6th, Benesch Law, including Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group, stands ready to assist with any questions as we closely follow COVID-19 developments and support our clients’ response efforts in the labor and employment and other relevant areas.
Joseph N. Gross at jgross@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4163;
Joseph R. Blalock at jblalock@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9359.
Benesch, including Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group, stands ready to assist with any questions as we closely follow COVID-19 developments and support our clients’ response efforts in all areas of their business. For more information relating to COVID-19, please see:
Client Bulletins | March 13, 2020
U.S. Department of Labor Offers Guidance on COVID-19 Wage Related Issues
Client Bulletins | March 06, 2020
COVID-19: Focus on Employment Law Considerations
Client Bulletins | March 02, 2020
COVID-19: Health and Legal Considerations Convene
Client Bulletins | February 21, 2020
Reduction and Exemption of Chinese Employer’s Contribution to Social Insurance
Client Bulletins | February 13, 2020
2019-nCoV Outbreak and Related Legal Concerns for Enterprises in China
Latest News
Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Estoppel Standard in Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a rigid rule that often blocked debtors from pursuing claims they failed to disclose in bankruptcy. Courts must now look at the full circumstances before deciding whether an omission was intentional or an honest mistake.
Federal Court Hands Major Win to Tissue Product Manufacturers – FDA’s HCT/P Classification Decision for Umbilical Cord–Derived Product CORDGRAFT Rejected
On March 18, 2026, Chief Judge Brian C. Wimes of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a significant decision overturning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) classification of Vitti Labs’ umbilical cord–derived product, CORDGRAFT.
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.