Client Alerts & Insights
New Legislation Introduced to Protect and Expand Employee Rights and Benefits in New York
September 12, 2023
Authored By:
New York Criminalizes Wage Theft
On September 6, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed legislation making failure to pay wages a criminal offense. The new law, (S2832-A/A154-A), expands New York’s definition of larceny to include “wage theft,” specifically providing that:
a person obtains property by wage theft when he or she hires a person to perform services that the person performs such services and the person does not pay wages, at the minimum wage rate and overtime, or promised wage, if greater than the minimum wage rate and overtime to said person for work performed.
It further amends the definition of “property” to include “compensation for labor or services.” The penalties for wage theft under the new law range from small fines to incarceration, depending on the severity of the offense. Multiple instances of wage theft may also be aggregated into a single larceny count.
The new law follows the Manhattan District Attorney’s February 2023, implementation of a ‘Worker Protection Unit’ to investigate wage theft allegations and prosecute alleged offenders. Prosecutors across New York State may now use the new law to pursue criminal penalties against employers that withhold wages in their jurisdictions. It remains to be seen, however, whether employers who inadvertently fail to comply with New York’s complex wage and hour laws will be able to rely on the larceny statute’s “intent to deprive” requirement as a defense.
In light of New York’s criminalization of wage theft, employers should ensure that they remain in full compliance with New York’s robust wage and hour laws. This includes properly paying workers for all hours worked and keeping comprehensive and accurate records of the same. Failure to do so is now riskier than ever.
Increased Workers’ Compensation Benefits in New York
Governor Hochul also signed legislation which increased the benefits for workers compensation under New York law. Specifically, minimum benefits as of January 1, 2024 will be no less than $250 per week, unless an employee’s wage is less than $250 per week, in which case employees will receive the full amount of their weekly wage. This amount will increase to $325 per week on January 1, 2025.
After July 1, 2026, those receiving workers’ compensation benefits in New York will be entitled to no less than one-fifth of the New York State average weekly wage, unless an employee’s wage is less than or equal to one-fifth of the New York State average weekly wage, in which case the employee will receive the full amount of their weekly wage.
Quite naturally, an increase in these benefit amounts could result in an increase in claims. Employers should be mindful of the same going forward.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Adam Primm at aprimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Christopher W. Pendleton at cpendleton@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6219.
Latest News
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Feds Set Their Sights on Ohio: Unpacking the Federal-State Partnership
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).