Client Alerts & Insights
Don’t Forget Your Employees on Valentine’s Day (No, Really): California’s Notification Deadline for All Employees with Non-Competition Agreements is February 14, 2024
February 13, 2024
Authored By:
As previously highlighted by Benesch, California strengthened its long-standing prohibition on non-competition agreements on January 1, 2024.
In addition, and also as previously highlighted by Benesch, one of these amendments established what has commonly now been called the “Valentine’s Day Deadline” by many California employers: by February 14, 2024, employers must provide notice to all current employees in California, as well as all former employees in California who were employed after January 1, 2022, that any non-competition clauses to which they agreed are void and unenforceable. Importantly, this notice (1) must be individualized; and (2) must be sent via mail to a (current or former) employee’s last known mailing address and via email to a (current or former) employee’s last known email address. Failure to provide proper notice constitutes unfair competition under California law and can result in a penalty of $2,500 per violation. Violations can also lead to recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs. It is unclear as of now whether this law applies to non-solicitation provisions, but California courts have in the past treated customer non-solicitation provisions as unenforceable non-competition provisions.
Although many might be tracking down a last-minute gift or securing a dinner reservation in the eleventh hour before Valentine’s Day, California employers (and all employers with employees in California) should ensure that they comply with California’s “Valentine’s Day Deadline” and send appropriate notices to all current employees and former employees who were employed after January 1, 2022.
For more information, contact:
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Charles Leuin at cleuin@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6344.
Scott Humphrey at shumphrey@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6420.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.