Client Alerts & Insights
Department of Labor Officially Withdraws Trump-Era Independent Contractor Final Rule
May 10, 2021
Authored By:
On May 5, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor withdrew the pro-business Independent Contractor Final Rule published in the final days of President Trump’s administration. This withdrawal follows the Department of Labor’s previous actions signaling a shifting stance on contractor-related matters including the proposed delay of implementation of the Final Rule and notice and comment period. The notice and comment period for the proposed withdrawal closed on April 12, 2021. On May 5, 2021, the Department of Labor announced that the rule would be withdrawn effective May 6, 2021.
Under the now-withdrawn Final Rule, employers would have been able to use the “economic reality” test by applying two core factors, and three other “guideposts” to determine status. Under the two core factors, the Department of Labor would have considered: (1) the nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. These factors were intended to “carry greater weight in the analysis than any other,” according to the Department’s publications prior to the withdrawal of the Final Rule. If the two factors conflicted, employers then would have considered three other “guidepost” factors, which would have assessed: (3) the amount of skill required for the work, (4) the degree of permanence in the working relationship, and (5) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production.
According to the Biden administration’s Department of Labor, the now-withdrawn Final Rule was inconsistent with the FLSA’s purpose and text as well as existing judicial precedent. Also, the Department of Labor expressed concern that the prioritization of the two core factors would have undermined the longstanding “economic realities” test under which courts and agencies review a totality of the circumstances. The Department of Labor further acknowledged its concern that the Final Rule would have resulted in workers losing FLSA protections.
For the time being, the Department of Labor has not yet proposed a new independent contractor classification rule. Judicial precedent and Department of Labor regulations and guidance that were in place prior to the Final Rule’s publication continue to apply. The Department of Labor will consider the “economic realities” test to be the governing standard. In the economic realities test, a factfinder considers the following six factors as relevant to the analysis of whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor:
- the extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business;
- the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill;
- the extent of the relative investments of the employer and the worker;
- whether the work performed requires special skills and initiative;
- the permanency of the relationship; and
- the degree of control exercised or retained by the employer.
As employers should already have developed classification practices based on the preexisting economic realities test or more stringent state laws, this withdrawal does not create any new laws or rules with which employers must comply and accordingly modify practices. However, employers that have not already analyzed their contractor classification practices should do so, as the Biden administration has made clear that the expansion of protections for employees will be part of the administration’s agenda. Benesch is continuing to monitor further developments and will provide future alerts as the Biden administration’s Department of Labor continues to develop its stance on the proper classification of workers as independent contractors.
For more information on this topic, contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment practice group.
Corey Clay at CClay@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4158.
Adam Primm at APrimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Jordan J. Call at JCall@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6169.
Latest News
Tariff Refund Q&A: What to Do Now and What Legal Issues Lay Ahead
The administrative process for obtaining IEEPA tariff refunds from U.S. Customs and Border Protection will soon go live. This brings to a close the wide speculation about whether an administrative process will be available to importers who paid IEEPA-based tariffs that the U.S. Supreme Court determined were unlawful.
LEAD vs. ACO REACH–What’s Changing and Why the LEAD Model Matters for ACOs and Participating Providers
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (“LEAD”) model is Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center’s (Innovation Center) newly announced successor to the ACO Realizing Equity, Access, and Community Health (REACH) model. While LEAD retains the core framework of two-sided risk and population-based payments, it introduces critical changes aimed at making the program more sustainable, inclusive and effective to foster longer term administration for providers.
CMS Puts Specialists in the Game with LEAD
For years, many specialist physicians have watched Medicare’s ACO programs from the sidelines, uncertain how to participate in models historically centered on primary care providers. The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model marks a fundamental shift in this dynamic.
CMS Bets on the Long Game with 10‑Year LEAD ACO Model
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s (Innovation Center) next-generation accountable care initiative, created to succeed the ACO REACH model in 2027.