Client Alerts & Insights
Labor Department Plans to Revise “White Collar” Overtime Rule
July 5, 2017
The U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) plans to revise its pending overtime rule, which would have more than doubled the minimum annual salary for workers in “white collar” executive, administrative and professional positions to be “exempt” from eligibility for overtime wages.
In late November, Texas District Judge Amos Mazzant blocked the DOL from implementing the revised rule with a nationwide preliminary injunction. Judge Mazzant held that Congress defined the “white collar” exemptions based on an employee’s duties, not on his or her salary. Judge Mazzant concluded that, “Congress did not intend salary to categorically exclude an employee with [exempt] duties from the exemption.”
In a brief filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the government changed position, stating: “[DOL] has decided not to advocate for the specific salary level ($913 per week) set in the final rule at this time and intends to undertake further rulemaking to determine what the salary level should be.”
DOL, however, intends to wait until after the Fifth Circuit decides whether the regulatory agency has the statutory authority to require employers to meet any salary test before revising the pending overtime rule.
As the government told the Fifth Circuit: “The rulemaking process imposes significant burdens on both the promulgating agency and the public, and [DOL] is reluctant to issue a proposal predicated on its authority to establish a salary level test while this litigation remains pending.”
Instead, DOL will publish a request for information seeking public input on several questions that will aid in the development of a proposal.
It is unclear what the DOL would set as a minimum salary threshold, although it is likely to be substantially less than the $47,476 floor in the pending overtime rule. During his confirmation hearing in March, Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta said the $47,476 was excessive and indicated that he was open to a more reasonable salary level—“somewhere around $33,000.” He also noted that it has not been adjusted in over 10 years.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.
Johanna Fabrizio Parker at jparker@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4585.
Rick Hepp at rhepp@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4657.
Latest News
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.
Chameleon Carriers—FMCSA’s “Reincarnated” Rule and Enforcement
As the U.S. DOT and its FMCSA ramp up certain elements of domestic enforcement, regulators are utilizing existing laws and regulations that previously were not often invoked. Enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement is one great example.
What’s Old Is New Again: Broker Liability Insulation from the Case Law in the Post-Montgomery Era
The Supreme Court has spoken in its Montgomery v. Caribe Transport decision, and the brokerage sector, and even shipper and motor carriers, are working toward adapting to this “new liability regime.”