Client Alerts & Insights
New FCPA Guidance Underscores Importance of Internal Compliance for Companies Doing Business Abroad
June 12, 2025
Authored By:
On June 9, 2025, Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General for the United States Department of Justice, published guidelines for investigations and prosecutions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). These guidelines demonstrate a shift in priorities as part of the Trump Administration’s effort toward “total elimination” of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs). On June 10, 2025, the head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, Matthew R. Galeotti, spoke before the American Conference Institute about FCPA enforcement under the new guidelines and urged companies to self-report potential misconduct.[1]
Shift in Priorities for FCPA Investigations and Prosecutions
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche published Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, (“Guidelines”) in response to President Trump’s February 2025 Executive Order,[1] which Benesch previously reported on. The Executive Order, entitled Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security, ordered the Department of Justice to (1) pause new FCPA investigations or enforcement actions absent specific authorization by the Attorney General for 180 days; (2) review existing FCPA cases and “take appropriate action” to further the president’s directive; and (3) publish updated guidelines for investigation and prosecution under the FCPA.
The President also recently directed the federal government to pursue “total elimination” of Cartels and TCOs.[2] The Guidelines aim to ensure that prosecutors comply with the President’s directives by focusing FCPA actions specifically on foreign bribery connected to criminal Cartel and TCO operations that undermine U.S. interests. The Guidelines instruct prosecutors not to focus on alleged misconduct involving “routine business practices” or “nonspecific malfeasance [by] corporate structures.”
Focus Areas for Investigations and Prosecutions
The Guidelines prioritize four main types of alleged misconduct in FCPA investigations and prosecutions:
- Conduct with a nexus to TCOs or Cartels, including alleged misconduct that (1) is associated with the criminal operations of a TCO or Cartel; (2) uses money launderers or shell companies that also launder for a TCO or Cartel; or (3) is linked to employees of state-owned entities or foreign officials that received bribes from a TCO or Cartel.
- Conduct that negatively impacts U.S. entities by depriving them of fair access to compete or otherwise injuring them financially.
- Conduct that poses national security threats, like bribery of corrupt foreign officials that involves critical infrastructure, key assets, and defense or intelligence sectors.
- “Serious misconduct,” such as substantial bribe payments, proven and sophisticated efforts to conceal bribe payments, fraudulent conduct in furtherance of a bribery scheme, or efforts to obstruct justice.
While the Guidelines encourage prosecutors to shift their focus in FCPA actions, they are not exhaustive. Prosecutors must consider the totality of circumstances and comply with other DOJ policies in determining whether to pursue a new FCPA investigation or prosecution, and when reviewing current cases.
Impact of the Guidelines on FCPA Enforcement According to DOJ’s Criminal Division Head
On June 10, 2025, the day after the Deputy Attorney General published the new FCPA Guidelines, Criminal Division Head Matthew R. Galeotti spoke before the American Conference Institute about the impact of the Guidelines on DOJ’s FCPA enforcement strategies.
According to Mr. Galeotti, FCPA prosecutions will focus on “conduct that genuinely impacts the American people” by undermining U.S. national interests. Even though DOJ generally will not prosecute conduct that does not implicate U.S. interests, Mr. Galeotti said the criminal division “won’t hesitate” to work with foreign law enforcement or other domestic regulators to help them “vindicate their interests.” This means U.S. businesses or individuals may still be investigated and prosecuted for misconduct under other federal laws or by foreign law enforcement entities.
Mr. Galeotti urged business and compliance leaders and their legal advisors to self-report potential FCPA violations and other offenses. “Report potential crimes, root out misconduct, cooperate with the Department, and help the company remediate . . . and when you do, significant benefits are available to your clients.” Failure to self-report crimes that undermine U.S. interests will result in “aggressive” prosecution.
Conclusion
DOJ’s new enforcement priorities create a new risk landscape, especially for U.S. companies with business interests in countries where cartels are known to infiltrate legitimate businesses. It is imperative, therefore, that U.S. businesses closely reexamine their compliance programs and understand the entities they interact with abroad. Benesch’s White Collar, Government Investigations & Regulatory Compliance Group is comprised of several former federal prosecutors with vast experience prosecuting cartels and TCOs. Our experience and deep knowledge of this landscape is critical in creating and updating compliance controls tailored to your organization’s specific needs and risks.
[1] Executive Order, Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/pausing-foreign-corrupt-practices-act-enforcement-to-further-american-economic-and-national-security/ (Feb. 10, 2025).
[2] Executive Order, Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists, Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists – The White House (Jan. 20, 2025).
Marisa Darden at mdarden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4440.
Matthew Ridings at mridings@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4512.
Robert Kolansky at rkolansky@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4575.
Latest News
Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Estoppel Standard in Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a rigid rule that often blocked debtors from pursuing claims they failed to disclose in bankruptcy. Courts must now look at the full circumstances before deciding whether an omission was intentional or an honest mistake.
Federal Court Hands Major Win to Tissue Product Manufacturers – FDA’s HCT/P Classification Decision for Umbilical Cord–Derived Product CORDGRAFT Rejected
On March 18, 2026, Chief Judge Brian C. Wimes of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a significant decision overturning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) classification of Vitti Labs’ umbilical cord–derived product, CORDGRAFT.
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.