Client Alerts & Insights
New Stark Law Exceptions and Anti Kickback Statute Safe Harbors Encourage the Adoption and Implementation of Health Information Technology Systems
August 22, 2006
On August 1, 2006, Michael Leavitt, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, announced the promulgation of final rules providing new exceptions to the Stark Law and new safe harbors to the Anti-Kickback Statute designed to encourage physicians to implement electronic prescribing and interoperable health records systems.The final rules take effect on October 10, 2006.
Electronic prescribing technology allows physicians to transmit a prescription electronically to a patient’s pharmacy, while interoperable electronic health records systems allow for the sharing of health records among multiple providers and/or facilities that may be treating a patient.Proponents of these new technologies have asserted that both will contribute to the reduction in the total number of errors and will improve efficiency and overall patient care.Introducing the new rules, Leavitt said, “Electronic health records help doctors provide higher quality patient care, improved efficiency and with less hassle. . . . By removing barriers, these regulation changes will help physicians get these systems in place and working for patients faster.”
Ordinarily, providing such technology to referral sources without charge or at a below market rate would run afoul of the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute, potentially triggering investigations, fines and criminal liability. The Stark Law prohibits physician self-referrals unless an exception applies, while the Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits receipt of monetary and non-monetary remuneration in exchange for referrals.Both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) announced new regulations that essentially mirror each other, as CMS has jurisdiction over Stark Law matters and the OIG has jurisdiction over matters brought pursuant to the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Under the new electronic prescribing technology rules, certain entities, including, for example, hospitals and group practices, may donate items and services such as hardware, software, internet connectivity and training and support services to qualifying physicians.These transactions will now fall outside the prohibitions of the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute if the donor of the items and services does not limit the compatibility of the technology with other systems, make receipt of the technology conditioned on doing business with the recipient or take into consideration the volume or value of the referrals the donor receives from the recipient.The parties must also enter into a written agreement setting forth several terms, including the items being provided along with their costs.
While the interoperable health records systems rules are similar to the electronic prescribing technology rules and include each of the above stated requirements, there are a few meaningful differences.First, noticeably absent from these rules is a provision allowing for the donation of hardware.Instead, these rules allow for the donation only of software and information technology and training services.Moreover, physicians must pay 15% of the donor’s costs, the amount of which must be specified in the written agreement of the parties, and a donor may not make a loan to a recipient to enable the recipient to make this payment.Finally, these rules are set to expire on December 31, 2013, as President Bush has expressed a desire to have interoperable health records systems in place across the country by 2014.
Benesch’s Health Care Practice Group regularly counsels clients on health information technology issues.To find out more about recent developments in this area, please contact Harry M. Brown or Alan E. Schabes in Cleveland or Janet K. Feldkamp or Frank Carsonie in Columbus.
Latest News
The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Going Back to the “Well”: Plaintiffs Target Wellness Branding by Attacking Ingredients
Plaintiffs are increasingly targeting food and beverage companies’ “wellness” and “free-from” marketing claims, focusing on ingredient-level details that allegedly contradict broad statements on the labels.
The CFTC’s New Cooperation Playbook: What Practitioners Need to Know About Letter No. 26-15
In a recent Staff Advisory to the Enforcement Division , the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) released guidance on how companies can avoid enforcement actions—or receive substantial penalty reductions—through early and full disclosure of potential misconduct.
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.