Client Alerts & Insights
President Signs ADA Amendments Act
October 15, 2008
Authored By:
On Thursday, September 25, President Bush signed into law several amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) that will go into effect on January 1, 2009. Currently, a qualifying disability under the ADA includes only those “physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activity,” such as performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, walking, standing, and thinking. With these new amendments, however, the scope of what is considered a qualifying disability will be greatly expanded, as the amendments redefine what is a “disability” and “impairment” under the law, as well as the standard by which a qualifying disability affects an individual’s major life activity.
The amendments overrule Supreme Court precedent and prohibit employers from considering mitigating measures, such as medication, prosthetics, or hearing aids, when determining whether an employee has a qualifying disability. An exception exists only for eye glasses and contact lenses. In addition, the amendments operate to include episodic disabilities or disabilities that are in remission as qualifying disabilities. The amendments further alter the interpretation of whether a particular disability satisfies the ADA definition by expanding on whether it “substantially limits” a major life activity, revising the standard to whether the disability “materially restricts” a major life activity. In addition to expanding what is a qualifying disability under the ADA, the amendments also empower the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Attorney General, and the Department of Transportation with authority to issue regulations and guidance on how these revised definitions should be interpreted.
Finally, the amendments to the ADA clarify coverage under the statute for an individual who is “regarded as” being disabled under the law, excluding minor impairments of less than six months in duration and an employer’s requirement to provide a reasonable accommodation. The amendments clarify that the employee continues to bear the burden of proving that he or she is qualified with a disability, or discriminated against due to a perceived mental or physical impairment.
Revisions to the ADA will have a significant practical impact on employers as employees with conditions previously not recognized under the statute, such as epilepsy and cancer, will be covered under the revised law. With this increase in potential claimants, it is expected that a resulting increase in lawsuits and administrative charges will occur as well.
If you have additional questions or would like to discuss the impact of the revisions to the ADA on your specific operations and policies, please contact any of the following members of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group:
Maynard A. Buck – 216-363-4694
Joseph N. Gross – 216-363-4163
Peter N. Kirsanow – 216-363-4481
Latest News
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.