Client Alerts & Insights
Proposed Changes to Hours of Service Regulations Released by U.S. DOT
August 14, 2019
The long awaited proposed changes by the U.S. Department of Transportation to the Hours of Service regulations are set to be published tomorrow in the Federal Register. A summary of the relevant proposed changes to 49 CFR PART 395 are listed below:
- 30-Minute Rest Break Provision: The break will be required after 8 hours of driving time (as compared to 8 hours after coming on duty) and will be logged as on-duty, not driving (as compared to previously being off-duty).
- Split Sleeper Berth Provision: 7/3 hour splits would now be allowed (previously 8/2 split).
- Adverse Driving Conditions: On-duty time may be extended to accommodate 2 additional hours of driving when encountering adverse conditions. (Further clarification on adverse conditions has been requested.)
- Short-Haul Exception to Record of Duty Status for CDL Drivers: Short haul CDL drivers will be able to operate within a 150 air-mile radius and up to 14 hours (previously 100 air miles and 12 hours).
- 14 Hour On-Duty Period: A driver would be allowed to “pause” his or her 14 hour on-duty period once, up to 3 hours during the duty day period.
The U.S. DOT is seeking comment on these proposed changes as they are not yet final. At first glance, the proposed changes should create more flexibility in the driver’s ability to manage his or her hours by allowing the driver to adjust to loading/unloading delays, traffic delays, and other common hurdles throughout the work day.
For more information on the impact of the proposed changes, please contact Matt Selby or anyone on the Benesch Transportation & Logistics Practice Group. Stay tuned for further updates.
Latest News
Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Estoppel Standard in Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a rigid rule that often blocked debtors from pursuing claims they failed to disclose in bankruptcy. Courts must now look at the full circumstances before deciding whether an omission was intentional or an honest mistake.
Federal Court Hands Major Win to Tissue Product Manufacturers – FDA’s HCT/P Classification Decision for Umbilical Cord–Derived Product CORDGRAFT Rejected
On March 18, 2026, Chief Judge Brian C. Wimes of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a significant decision overturning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) classification of Vitti Labs’ umbilical cord–derived product, CORDGRAFT.
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.