Client Alerts & Insights
Third State This Month Passes Pay Equity Legislation
May 31, 2019
Authored By:
On May 30, 2019, the Alabama state legislature passed a bill that would prohibit wage differentials for similar work on the basis or sex or race. The legislation must still be signed into law by Governor Kay Ivey (R). If enacted, Alabama will leave Mississippi as the only state in the nation that does not have a wage discrimination law on the books.
While most states already prohibit wage discrimination in some fashion, a string of recent legislation has aimed to place additional restriction on employers, focusing primarily on wage and salary history information. As with Washington and Colorado, the Alabama legislation would prohibit employers from discriminating or retaliating against job applicants who refuse to provide their wage and salary history. Unlike Washington and Colorado, however, the Alabama legislation does not include an outright prohibition on employer inquiries about salary histories. Instead, the bill only prohibits employers from refusing to interview, hire, promote, or employ an applicant who refuses to provide such information.
For current employees, the law prohibits employers from paying different wages for similar work based on race or sex. Most employers will also be required to keep records of wages, wage rates, job classifications, and other terms and conditions of employment for all employees for a period of three years.
The legislation authorizes employees and applicants to sue employers in state court for lost wages and interest, but requires employee-plaintiffs to specifically plead that they were paid less than someone else for equal work despite possessing equal skill, effort, education, experience, and responsibility, and that the wage disparity is not attributable to any of the following: (1) a seniority system; (2) a merit system; (3) a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (4) any factor other than sex or race. The legislation is silent regarding the pleading requirements for applicants alleging violations of the salary history provisions.
If signed by the Governor, the legislation will take effect on the first day of the third month after its signing. In the interim, employers should consider reviewing job applications and applicable pay scales for compliance with the legislation.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Latest News
Managing Risk When Terminating Vendor Relationships
Terminating a vendor relationship is not as simple as stopping performance. Companies should carefully follow the contract’s termination provisions, including notice requirements, cure periods and other procedural obligations. Failure to do so can create breach-of-contract claims even when vendor performance issues exist.
Is Your PFAS Coverage at Risk? An Ohio Federal Court Ruling Opens the Door to Broader Insurer Denials
The federal holding in Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral Ins. Co., the first of its kind, could reshape how insurers respond to PFAS-related coverage demands. Fire-Dex, a manufacturer of firefighter turnout gear, was sued by firefighters who alleged that exposure to PFAS from the gear caused cancer.
SEC Publishes the Long-Awaited Regulation Crypto Assets Proposed Rules
The SEC has proposed its most comprehensive crypto framework to date, creating a clearer regulatory path for digital asset projects from launch through maturity. The proposal includes new exemptions for startups and fundraising activities, along with disclosure requirements intended to provide greater certainty for issuers and investors.
Cross-Border Transport Risks: Cabotage Regulatory Enforcement Intensifies
Cabotage enforcement at the U.S.-Mexico border has sharply intensified in recent months, as federal agencies deploy new data-sharing practices to identify and bar drivers with cabotage violations from crossing into the United States.