Transportation & Logistics
The Benesch Transportation & Logistics Group is nationally preeminent and was specifically created to address the needs of users and providers of transportation and logistics services. This multidisciplinary group of transactional, regulatory and litigation attorneys, like so many others within the firm, services clients nationally and internationally.
Overview
Benesch is nationally recognized in Transportation Law and was named Transportation Law Firm of the Year by Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” in 2014, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2022, 2023, and 2025. Only one firm nationwide is selected for this honor each year, making it a significant distinction. Our practice is also nationally recognized by Chambers® 2025.
We have significant experience in transportation and logistics management, in all transportation modes, on a regional, national and global basis. Seven of the group’s attorneys were formerly in the transportation industry, working in-house at various motor carriers and freight forwarders for decades. Consequently, we are also able to provide valuable industry perspectives and a deep and broad historical knowledge of the regulatory and legal regime. Our firm also has specific expertise in supply chain, logistics management and warehousing related issues. By its very nature, the transportation industry is labor intensive. Thus, our labor and employment law skill sets are an integral part of the Transportation & Logistics Group. Also, we have deep experience with cargo claims, vehicular casualty work, environmental claims, coverage disputes, freight charge disputes, freight intermediary issues, transportation and warehouse contracting, regulatory matters, acquisitions, restructuring and subrogation work.
Benesch is one of the few law firms in the country that not only has a full service Transportation & Logistics Practice Group, but also represents entities all along the transportation continuum and in all modes of transportation – whether surface (truck or rail), water (ocean as well as inland waterways) or air (international and domestic). We understand the business. We understand the thought processes, rationales, and business and legal motivations of other entities in the transportation chain with whom our clients have dealings. We are able to thus springboard from that expertise and extrapolate it into cutting edge, up-to-the-minute legal representation of our clients in transportation and logistics. This cutting edge representation maximizes protections and advantages for our clients in that transportation continuum.
More specifically, we represent motor carriers, air carriers, rail carriers and maritime carriers. However, we also represent a broad array of “freight intermediaries,” e.g., transportation brokers, surface freight forwarders, air freight forwarders, ocean freight forwarders and non-vessel operating common carriers. We represent warehousing entities up and down the transportation chain and numerous shippers and consignees. This broad based expertise, and intricate and intensive working knowledge of all aspects, and all entities, in the transportation continuum, places Benesch in a unique position to serve its clients in an extraordinary way.
We also have specific experience in all types of contracts up and down the transportation continuum. We regularly assist our clients with the drafting, negotiation and revision of shipper-carrier contracts, broker-carrier contracts, broker-shipper contracts, warehouseman contracts, cross-docking arrangements, drayage contracts, customs brokerage contracts, port-terminal operational contracts, global services agreements and the plethora of other transportation and logistics contracts in the industry.
The group is also well experienced at preparing and negotiating warehouse operating and pick-&-pack agreements for major distribution center activities for both domestic and international shipments in addition to mainstream domestic motor carrier and rail related transportation and broker agreements. The group also has extensive experience in preparing and negotiating multimodal transportation contracts for shipments that never touch the United States and move point to point between countries throughout the world, particularly with respect to cargo with governing law provisions based upon treaties and conventions.
We also have experience in developing state of the art contractual transportation templates for shippers, carriers and intermediaries for use with all modes of transportation. Each template is designed for regular use and specifically to protect the interests of the client. Some representative matters in this regard include:
- Joint venture and operating agreement for an automobile terminal and rail intermodal unloading facility – Edmonton, Canada
- Management Service Agreement with Taha el Roubi & Co., Khartoum, Sudan – management personnel provided for road construction project
- Agreement with GM/Toyota joint venture in Fremont, California for “just-in-time” unbound parts delivery system
- Logistics service agreement for e-commerce fulfillment services
- Railcar Lease and Car Service Agreement for large fleet of railcars
Transportation remains an industry heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments. In trucking, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations require carriers to establish and maintain safety compliance systems for drivers and vehicles. Hazardous materials transportation requirements and transportation security issues have moved front and center in this era of higher security.
Benesch’s lawyers have experience with the regulations that directly affect how our clients runs their businesses. We can proactively assist our clients in developing a compliance program, as well as respond to compliance issues if they should occur. We help our clients navigate the maze of transportation and other governmental regulations through our thorough understanding of the underlying objectives of the regulatory structure.
We also have preeminent experience in issues related to “carrier selection,” by which shippers, carriers and/or brokers are brought into catastrophic injury lawsuits in efforts to locate a deep pocket. (We have won several of these cases and also served as expert witnesses in several of these cases in which our clients have prevailed.).
We routinely conduct proactive mock USDOT safety audits and compliance reviews using the same methods as the FMCSA to determine the current state of a client’s compliance program. Our lawyers also defend and prepare motor carriers who have been selected for an actual audit or compliance review and develop corrective action plans to file for a safety rating upgrade for motor carriers with downgraded safety ratings. Likewise, we regularly assist our clients in improving their CSA scores, including DataQ appeals. In short, we develop all policies and documentation necessary for an effective safety compliance program. Other representative experience follows:
- Experience with STB & FMCSA in having assisted motor carriers, freight forwarders and brokers in obtaining and maintaining FMCSA operating authority
- Extensive experience in developing “carrier selection protocols” for our shipper and broker clients, so that those clients can prevent personal injury lawsuits based on “will-call” carrier selection
- Experience with cross-border issues within the NAFTA countries, including bills of lading, contractual, freight charge and freight loss and damage issues, and regulatory issues
- Experience with international transport regulatory issues and INCO terms
- Advised companies regarding continuing compliance with ever-changing regulatory issues specific to transportation providers
- Experience with Caribbean Basin regulatory issues
- Overweight, over length and oversize issues
Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group represents a wide variety of third-party logistics providers, including international freight forwarders. The firm helps these businesses find solutions to the challenges facing those operating in this dynamic industry – whether in the context of transportation by air or by ocean. Examples of our related experience are provided below:
- Representation of a Canadian 3PL which has freight forwarding operations in Canada, the U.S. and China, in navigating regulatory, governance and contractual issues.
- Representation of one of the world’s largest freight forwarders in developing a freight forwarding contract template to be used internationally for the provider’s largest global customers.
- Recently handled the purchase of an international freight forwarder by a private equity firm.
- Representation of a trucking company in its expansion into a global company by way of acquisition of an international air freight forwarder with operations in 45 countries. Representation included locating, analyzing and transitioning all legal files related to cargo; managing cargo claims for subsidiary; and serving as outside general counsel to the newly-acquired company. Managed all cargo claims for subsidiary of international freight forwarder.
- Representation of an ocean freight forwarder in arranging for the international, multi-modal transportation of valuable freight from Brazil.
- Representation of a Canadian transportation broker in establishing operations in China as an ocean freight forwarder.
- Prevailed in jury trial in which we represented an international freight forwarder regarding a high dollar contractual dispute involving a multimodal, specialized heavy haul international shipment, from the U.S. to France, several overlapping liability regimes and European permitting issues.
- Representation of a U.S.-based shipping agency and global supply chain solutions provider with its application for two NVOCC licenses in China.
- Representation of a Chinese logistics and warehousing company in due diligence related to its potential purchase by a leading U.S. 3PL and international freight forwarding services provider.
- Currently representing a multibillion dollar U.S. freight transportation and logistics company in its NVOCC application in China.
- Currently defending an international freight forwarder against a cargo claim stemming from intermodal transportation.
Among other things, our team actively represents a wide variety of companies in various segments of the transportation industry located throughout the country in establishing, improving and managing effective independent contractor programs for companies headquartered throughout North America including California, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, and which operate nationwide and in Canada. These operations include:
- Regional Package/Parcel Delivery: Step vans, cargo vans and linehaul
- Regional and National Retail Delivery: Cargo vans, straight trucks (bobtails) and linehaul
- Regional Pharmaceutical Distribution: DC to pharmacy and/or physicians: cargo vans
- Regional and Same-Day Courier
- Truckload
Dry Van Flatbed Bulk and Tank
Refrigerated Specialized and Rigging Drayage
- “Lite” LTL
Specific representative examples of Benesch’s experience in the area of independent contractors include:
- Successfully defended several motor carriers at the National Labor Relations Board against attempts by the Teamsters to challenge the motor carriers’ classification of owner-operators as independent contractors
- Successfully defended several motor carriers in preserving their independent contractor worker classification status of their drivers in actions brought by the IRS, state agencies (workers compensation and employment compensation) both at the administrative level and in litigation
- Successfully defended motor carriers in class action lawsuits brought by OOIDA and defeated class certification
We recognize that proactive, preventive maintenance is the most effective way of avoiding costly litigation. To that end, we are very active in counseling clients on day-to-day employment issues as they arise.
This counseling takes many forms, such as:
- Reviewing disciplinary or discharge decisions
- Reviewing policies, programs and compensation plans for compliance with the Title VII, FMLA, ADA, FLSA, ADEA, O.R.C. § 4112 and the myriad of other employment laws
- Advising employers during reductions in force
- Providing supervisor training on issues such as employment-at-will, equal employment opportunity and workplace harassment
- Preparing employment agreements
- Implementing alternative dispute resolution programs.
The counseling we provide is always with complete recognition that maximizing the client’s business position is as important a priority as avoiding litigation. Specific examples of the counseling we have provided include the following:
- Advised a multi-national retail jewelry chain regarding employment policy implementation in the areas of background checks, FMLA compliance, media relations, ADA compliance, telecommuting and workers’ compensation
- Advised a multinational client on the consolidation of manufacturing plants in several states, together with the reduction in force of its national sales organization, which involved the implementation of layoffs and severance programs, as well as WARN compliance
- Counseled a multinational office supply chain on the structuring and implementation of an alternative dispute resolution program for its employees
- Counseled an international telecommunications company in connection with the downsizing of several plants and compliance with WARN and Older Worker Benefit Protection Act requirements
As times change and companies strive to meet growing demands to receive the right product at the right place and in good condition – immediately – our scope of services has also evolved to accommodate the business realities to which our dynamic client base must respond.
Our transportation and logistics clients from across the country have broadened their industry scopes and entered innumerable new marketplaces, new niches and new supply chain strategies. Our clients have come to us with a myriad of amazingly creative ideas, pioneering business models and new hybridized enterprises. We pride ourselves in maximizing the value of our seat at the table. We are uniquely experienced in contributing to the development of those ideas, those new concepts and those new niches, and helping our clients refine their strategies and structure their implementations with appropriate contractual documents, risk-appropriate transactional and regulatory compliance methods, and internal corporate documentation and guidance – to make those ideas soar.
We have helped our clients launch hybridized value-added warehousing concepts, created backhaul brokerage operations at and within private fleets, established brokerage operations within motor carriers, set up motor carrier and warehouse operations within brokerages, offered light assembly services from within warehouse operations, and many other creative ideas that have generated positive, legally compliant growth for our client base.
Active and Pervasive Involvement in Pertinent Industry Organizations
We believe that it is critical for legal counsel during this visionary time to be current and on the cutting edge of all industry, legal and regulatory developments. To that effect, the attorneys in our Transportation & Logistics Group play active and integral roles in various industry-wide organizations, helping us to stay on that cutting edge. For instance, Marc Blubaugh is the general counsel for IANA and thus is familiar with nationwide multimodal issues on a daily and ongoing basis. We are also members of the IWLA and speak at its legal seminar annually, and have drafted several template contracts for that organization. We are also active members of the TIA (Transportation Intermediaries Association). Martha Payne is on the Education Committee for that organization. Several of our lawyers have spoken at that organization’s annual conference and other CEO seminars for that group every year for at least the last decade. Our attorneys have served on the food transport committees and regulatory committees of that organization.
Several of our attorneys are active members of the Conference of Freight Counsel and have attended and presented at its meetings for decades. That organization is the preeminent organization dealing with freight loss and damage across all modes, including freight intermediaries. We actively participate, i.e. speaking, writing and attending conferences for numerous other industry groups that touch upon the freight intermediary/3PL space, including the Transportation Lawyers Association, the Truckload Carriers Association, the National Tank Truck Carriers, the Specialty Carriers & Rigging Association, the American Trucking Association (in which we hold several committee positions), the Transportation Loss Prevention & Security Association (one of our team members was a founding board member), Transportation and Logistics Council, Air Forwarders Association, the National Customs Brokers and Freight Forward Association of America and many more.
Focus Areas
“The team is extremely responsive and timely.” –Transportation & Logistics client, Chambers USA
“The firm has transportation lawyers with real-world experience, adding value in commercial transactions and disputes.” –Transportation & Logistics client, Chambers USA
Better with Benesch
Benesch is the premier resource for industry-leading transportation counsel.
Transportation & Logistics client, Chambers USA
High performance in practice
Ranked Nationally by Chambers® 2025
in Transportation Law
Ranked Top-Tier Nationally by Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms 2026
in Transportation Law
Named Transportation Law Firm of the Year by Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms
in 2014, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2022, 2023, and 2025
Experience
Represented Purolator, a leading Canadian provider of integrated freight, package and logistics solutions, as U.S. deal counsel in its acquisition of Livingston International from Platinum Equity.
Defended various motor carriers in nationwide putative class action allegation violations of federal and state labor laws.
Representing freight logistics and brokerage companies in various breach of contract actions against shipping customers and motor carriers.
Defended a warehouse operator in a nearly $10 million dollar dispute in federal court proceedings in Ohio and Massachusetts over termination of the operator’s relationship with an e-commerce retailer, successfully obtaining a series of favorable rulings regarding the customer’s claims.
Defended and prosecuted well over 100 cases involving claims for freight loss, damage, or delay in various stages of litigation and pre-litigation in state and federal courts throughout the entire United States.
Advised a commercial shipper regarding potential claims arising out of a $75 million+ loss of pharmaceuticals in transit.
Prosecuted a multimillion-dollar claim against affiliates of a bankrupt customer pursuant to a managed transportation agreement, involving parallel proceedings in bankruptcy court and state court based upon novel, intertwined, sophisticated issues under bankruptcy law, federal transportation law, and state contract law, the fusion of which ultimately assisted our client in reaching a favorable settlement.
Defended an action filed in Georgia by a large food distributor against our clients involving $1 million+ in accruing demurrage charges connected with dozens of refrigerated containers stuck at a port, ultimately negotiating a multiparty resolution.
Defended a putative Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier in an action pending before the Federal Maritime Commission in which a former customer was seeking a variety of remedies, including well over $1 million in detention and demurrage reparations pursuant to the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022, obtaining a highly favorable decision and collection of rulings on a number of legal issues of first impression under the statute.
Defended and obtained dismissal of various officers, directors, principals, and corporate affiliates of a motor carrier in an action arising out of a fatal highway accident for which the plaintiff was seeking to pierce the corporate veil and impose alter ego liability.
Defended a distributor in a federal court action arising out of alleged breach of a national distribution agreement with claims involving more than $30 million, involving not only the defense of the claims but prosecution of counterclaims turning on complex jurisdictional and procedural issues, which in turn required significant briefing and Court involvement over matters that could have substantially interrupted or curtailed the distribution of numerous products and their availability in the retail market.
Defended a fourth-party logistics provider in a warehousing dispute in federal court involving over $5 million of inventory destroyed in a Texas warehouse fire.
Defended a publicly traded freight broker in connection with claims arising out of a high-stakes fatal highway accident in Texas and procured a complete victory in connection with a motion to dismiss based upon federal preemption.
Defended freight broker in a substantial intrastate claim for freight damage in Alaska state court, ultimately obtaining dismissal under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act in the first decision in the nation finding extra-contractual claims preempted against freight brokers.
Defended a freight broker and its employee in a seven figure noncompete dispute in Michigan state court brought by the employee’s former employer and ultimately defeating summary judgment using some novel and innovative theories, thereby favorably changing the entire settlement dynamic just weeks before trial.
Defended a freight broker in a multimillion-dollar claim involving the theft of Bitcoin servers in California obtaining dismissal of all extra-contractual claims despite adverse precedent in the Ninth Circuit, ultimately leading to a highly favorable resolution.
Serves as outside General Counsel to the Intermodal Association of North America, the leading transportation trade association representing the combined interests of the intermodal freight industry, including intermodal and over-the-road motor carriers, railroads (Class I, short-line, and regional), water carriers, stacktrain operators, port authorities, intermodal marketing and logistics companies, and suppliers to the industry such as equipment manufacturers, leasing companies, and technology firms.
Serves as outside General Counsel to the Transportation Intermediaries Association, a not-for-profit trade association that has, for over 40 years, provided leadership, education and training resources, and public policy advocacy to the $343 billion per year third-party transportation and logistics industry.
Advised a leading provider of a platform connecting TMS, telematics, and transportation services with prebuilt integrations in its capital raise to support operations and growth.
Advised a leading transportation technology platform provider on a capital raise to support ongoing operations and accelerate growth.
Advised a national transportation and logistics company on workforce transition planning, including strategy development and preparation of termination and rehire notices in connection with a corporate restructuring.
Challenged an NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission mandate requiring cost-prohibitive retrofits for ride-share vehicles.*
Challenged the Town of East Hampton’s plan to close East Hampton Airport to commercial traffic and immediately re-open it for private use.*
Represented Clarendon Group in its acquisition financing of AllStates World Cargo, a leading national and international transportation company.
Represented Allstates WorldCargo, a portfolio company of Clarendon Capital, in its acquisition financing of Ground Freight Expeditors.
Representation of transportation entities and non-transportation entities seeking to register and undertake operations as NVOCCs and/or OFFs.
Representation of NVOCCs and OFFs in risk management and risk prevention matters.
Representation of ocean carriers/NVOCCs regarding maritime and multimodal contractual drafting and negotiations.
Developed parallel legal and commercial approaches for a global supplier of natural ingredients, including organic, non-GMO, and conventional product lines to manage a multi-million dollar dispute involving demurrage and detention charges against several ocean carriers.
Developed the strategic path forward and agreements for one of the world’s leading vertically integrated producers, distributors, and marketers of fresh and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables achieve the sale of two foreign-flagged ocean vessels registered in the Cayman Islands.
Addressed regulatory matters concerning the FMC and OTI (NVOCC and OFF) operating authority for a multimodal transportation services company.
Reviewed, assessed, and drafted new house bills of lading for an NVOCC that operates as an American multinational shipping and receiving and supply chain management company.
Represented an American multinational, pharmaceutical, and medical technologies corporation in drafting and negotiating Master Ground Transportation Services Agreements for freight brokerage services and motor carrier services throughout North America.
Represented a leading American big-box retail chain of home furnishing stores in drafting and negotiating Ocean Transportation Service Agreements.
Advised multiple enterprise shippers, intermediaries, and carriers to help navigate the practical impact the FMC’s Final Rule on Carrier Automated Tariffs under 46 C.F.R. Part 520 and Final Rule on Demurrage and Detention Billing Requirements under 46 C.F.R. Part 541 may have on the performance services, operations, and ongoing regulatory compliance.
Represented an American sporting goods retail chain and national apparel and accessory retailer in drafting and negotiating Ocean Transportation Service Agreements and managed its annual ocean bid.
Developed an entire suite of template agreements for all modes of transportation for one of the world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, off-highway diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines, and diesel-electric locomotives.
Represented a leading domestic ocean shipping and integrated logistics company in an assortment of regulatory matters, including addressing FMC tariff and rate-related inquiries, matters concerning inland surface transportation movements as part of water carriage between noncontiguous domestic U.S. points of origin and destination, advising on legal, commercial, and operational risks, as well as operating authority issues.
Represented a global luxury apparel and accessories company in drafting and negotiating Ocean Transportation Service Agreements and managed its annual ocean bid.
Represented a subsidiary of one of the largest energy companies in North America in a general average matter involving multiple shippers when the carrier’s vessel caught fire while in transit in the Pacific Ocean.
Successfully defended a client importer accused of unlawful importation to resolve a civil penalty case before U.S. Customs and Border Protection with over $200,000 in cost savings.
The New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Marinemax of Ohio, Inc., 408 F.Supp. 2d, 526, 63 Fed.R. Serv. 3d 976, (N.D. Ohio) Summary judgment regarding marine policy coverage issues.
Successfully defeated plaintiff’s attempt to remand trucking liability claim to state court on grounds that concurrent jurisdiction did not destroy federal question jurisdiction for purposes of removal to federal court. (Acuity, a Mut. Ins. Co. v. YRC Inc., No. 12cv2497), 2013 WL 646218 (N.D. Ohio 2013).
Mergers and Acquisitions – Providing valuable strategic vision on post-close opportunities, industry-focused due diligence review, counsel on legal and regulatory requirements, operational best practices, and commercial standards for targets in all modes and industry segments. Deal experience includes the digital brokerage, last mile and courier, air and ocean forwarder, value-add warehousing and fulfillment, and over-the-road trucking segments.
Licensing and Permits – Acquiring, transferring, updating, and modifying licenses, permits, and operating authorities including those required for motor carrier, indirect air carrier, foreign air freight forwarder, ocean forwarder, and non-vessel operating common carrier operations.
Obtained dismissal of state law claims in suit seeking damages against transportation provider on grounds of federal preemption under Carmack Amendment.
Obtained denial of class certification against motor class in nationwide class action alleging breach of contract, fraud, and violations of the Truth In Leasing regulations.
Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. v. D.J. Franzen, Inc., 2008 WL 3836535 (N.D. Ohio) Granting dismissal based upon federal Carmack Amendment preemption.
Defended transportation company at trial, in suit alleging negligence in loading of cargo.
F.M. Machine Co. v. R&L Carriers, Inc., 2009 WL 175977 (N.D. Ohio), Fed. Carr. Cas. P. 84, 610 Partial summary judgment enforcing liability limitations of motor carrier.
Associates Insurance Co. v. Whittington, 170 F.Supp. 2d 1119 (N.D. Ohio) Trucking insurance coverage summary judgment victory.
The company plans to accelerate investment in product and network expansion, both in the US and internationally.
Represent aircraft owners and purchases in leaseback and purchase agreements.
Represented businesses in Part 107 Remote Pilot and UAV certification, compliance, and airspace regulations.
Transportation and Logistics – Strategic advice and operations counsel on all aspects of transportation and logistics operations including development of new service lines and market entry, inter-company and third party relationships, equipment sourcing and asset management, driver sourcing and safety management, independent contractor owner-operator relationships, technology solutions, last mile operations, middle mile operations, drayage operations, import and export services, all forms of operational and customer contracting, and dispute resolution.
Supply Chain Management – Advising on global supply chain risk and best practices including supply and service procurement, vendor diligence, contracting, development of new production and distribution strategies, and dispute resolution.
Houmani v. Roadway Express, Inc., 2008 WL 731497 (N.D. Ohio) Freight loss and damage litigation; prevailed on summary judgment.
Automated Window Machinery, Inc. v. McKay Insurance Agency, Inc., 320 F.Supp. 619, Fed. Corr. Cas. P. 84, 343 (N.D. Ohio) Granting dismissal on federal Carmack Amendment preemption grounds.
International Trade Compliance – Preparing risk assessments for current and prospective international operations, developing meaningful compliance programs and pragmatic operating procedures, providing reasonable ad hoc advice as situations arise, preparing root cause analysis reports and producing corrective action plans for implementation, assisting in the determination of whether to submit voluntary self-disclosure notices, and representing clients during investigations and enforcement actions to minimize risk and mitigate exposure.
DWC Company v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 2009 WL 150671 (S.D. Ohio) Removal approved based upon 28 U.S.C § 1337’s “other paper” language.
Counsel to various national transportation companies in breach of contract actions in California, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
Counsel to international distributor in personal injury action in Pennsylvania.
Defended moving company for alleged violation of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations in putative nationwide class action.
Terminal Warehouse, Inc. v. CSX Transp., Inc., Fed. Corr. Cos. P. 85,442 (6th Cir.) Appeal of Surface Transportation Board decision as to railroad abandonment.
Obtained dismissal of trucking liability claim under Carmack Amendment due to insufficient evidence of damage.
Successfully resolved multi-state class action alleging violations of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations by motor carrier.
Represent and advise airports on FAA airport compliance and reporting requirements.
Mid-West Materials, Inc. v. Packard Logistics, Inc., 2007 WL 893890 (N.D. Ohio) Summary judgment dismissal; Carmack Amendment federal preemption.
Halpern v. Atlas Van Lines, 2009 WL 484202 (N.D. Ohio) Partial summary judgment, and awarding sanctions and fees.
Representation of the Intermodal Association of North America in connection with the very significant Hanjin bankruptcy in Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey. Obtained a court order prohibiting Hanjin from imposing detention charges on containers and chassis that motor carriers, shippers, and others could not return to Hanjin. This was a very substantial achievement for the intermodal industry and provided much needed certainty to those involved in intermodal transportation.
Smeltzer, et al. v. Binsley, et al., 2007 WL 397336, Ohio App. 9. Dist., No. 23092, 2007
Shonac Corporation v. Maersk, Inc. 159 F.Supp. 1020, 2001 A.M.C. 1924 (S.D. Ohio) Summary judgment regarding damages recoverable in a COGSA maritime case.
Counsel to various shippers, consignees, brokers, and transportation companies in freight claims and payment disputes across the company.
Counsel to international transportation company and transportation trade group in Chapter 15 Hanjin bankruptcy in New Jersey.
Brennan v. A-A Auto Transport, Inc., 2007 WL 2886355 (N.D. Ohio) Motion for Judgment on the pleadings granted; federal Carmack Amendment preemption.
Counsel to various transportation defendants in TransVantage bankruptcy in New Jersey.
Carr v. Olympian Moving & Storage, Fed. Carr Cas. P. 84, 459 (N.D. Ohio) Dismissal on complete federal Carmack Amendment preemption grounds.
Provide compliance counseling to motor carriers and transportation brokers under federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.
Successfully negotiated contractual disputes between freight logistics and brokerage companies and motor carriers.
Represented freight logistics and brokerage company in various breach of contract actions against shipping customers and motor carriers.
Defended freight logistics and brokerage company in tort claim brought by shipper of cargo damaged during rail transportation.
Represented manufacturer in Carmack and breach of contract dispute against logistics company and motor carrier following destruction of its cargo in train crash.
Defended freight logistics and brokerage company in breach of contract dispute and obtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds.
Defended motor carrier in Carmack dispute and obtained dismissal of lawsuit on summary judgment, including successfully defending dismissal on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Represented W.W. Williams in its sale of Auto Safety House, a commercial truck solutions provider and bus dealer, to Reading Truck Group.
Represented Allstates WorldCargo, a portfolio company of Clarendon Capital, in its acquisition of Ground Freight Expeditors.
Represented Clarendon Group in its recapitalization investment in Phoenix Intermodal Services, a leading national intermodal transportation business.
Represented Clarendon Group in its acquisition of AllStates World Cargo, a leading national and international transportation company.
Represented a global transport and logistics company in a warehouse dispute, successfully defending the company’s assertion of a warehouseman’s lien against an application for a writ of possession, which led to a favorable settlement shortly thereafter.
Contract Drafting and Negotiation – Drafting and negotiation of all manner of services contracts including: Motor Carrier, Broker, and Forwarder Services Agreements; Courier and Last Mile Delivery Services Agreements; Dray Agreements; Intermodal Services Agreements; Air Forwarding and Indirect Air Carrier Agreements; Air Charter and Block Space Agreements; Ocean Freight Forwarder and Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Agreements; Warehousing and Fulfillment Agreements; Distribution Agreements; Customs Broker, Export Forwarder, and Collateral Access Agreements; Power of Attorney Forms; Equipment Interchange Agreements; Equipment Lease and Rental Agreements; Independent Contractor Owner-Operator Lease Agreements; Bills of Lading and Waybills Terms; and Terms and Conditions of Service or Use.
Regulatory Enforcement – Successfully representing clients during regulatory enforcement investigations and audits, often with the elimination or mitigation of penalties, including experience before the: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Maritime Commission (FMC), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and State Public Utilities Commissions (PUC).
Served as in-house labor counsel for five years for Leaseway Transportation, which became Penske Logistics. Handled transportation-related labor matters in that capacity throughout the country, including, but not limited to, employment litigation, labor arbitrations, national master labor agreement negotiations, local union bargaining, EEO matters, DOT compliance, Wage&Hour investigations, and OFCCP audits.
Counseled logistics division of multi-national corporation on drug-testing and implementation of substance abuse rehabilitation program.
Prepared and updated employee handbooks for multi-state transportation & logistics companies.
Prepared non-competition agreements and other restrictive covenants for management-level employees in transportation & logistics companies.
Performed due diligence on labor & employment aspects of numerous mergers and acquisitions involving transportation & logistics companies.
Defended transportation & logistics companies against Truth-in-Leasing Act class actions.
Defended transportation & logistics companies against class actions for contractor misclassification under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state wage & hour laws.
Represented buyer in its add-on acquisition of a third-party transportation logistics services business and a motor carrier services business.
Represented a private equity sponsor in its acquisition of the assets of a domestic and international intermodal drayage and transportation logistics company.
Represented Global Transport Logistics, Inc. (“GTLi”) in its merger with Am Trans Expedite, Inc. and acquisition by Hudson Hill Capital to form Fusion Transport, a new logistics platform.
No results found
Key Contacts

Eric L. Zalud
Co-Chair, Transportation & Logistics Practice Group; Vice-Chair, Litigation Practice Group Cleveland ezalud@beneschlaw.com
Marc S. Blubaugh
Co-Chair, Transportation & Logistics Practice Group; Vice Chair, Litigation Practice Group Columbus mblubaugh@beneschlaw.com
Jonathan R. Todd
Vice Chair, Transportation & Logistics Practice Group Cleveland jtodd@beneschlaw.comRelated News
Watch Your T&Cs! When Done Right, Terms and Conditions are Both Viable—And Valuable
The era of the paper/hard copy bill of lading and/or rate confirmation is fading fast. Hard copies and paper do live on in various shipment schematics; however, increasingly, and at a very rapid rate, transactions between shippers, carriers, brokers and forwarders are conducted by, and memorialized in, electronic form via email, interactive website access and response, and—more and more—AI mechanisms.
Non-Domiciled CDLs – FMCSA Final Rule and its Operational Impacts
The Final Rule follows the FMCSA’s September 29, 2025 Interim Final Rule on non-domiciled CDLs and CLPs. The Final Rule and Interim Final Rule are materially identical.
Marc Blubaugh Quoted in NHDA Newsletter on Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
Marc Blubaugh, co-chair of Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group, was quoted in the February newsletter of the National Home Delivery Association (NHDA) …