Client Alerts & Insights
New York State Explicitly Limits Bounds of “No Fault” or Points-Based Attendance Policies
December 5, 2022
Authored By:
On November 21, 2022, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law a new measure that explicitly prevents employers from penalizing workers for lawful absences.
The new law amends Section 215 of New York Labor Law which prohibits employers from discharging, threatening, penalizing, discriminating or retaliating against any employee that engages in certain enumerated protected activities. The amendment adds “us[ing] any legally protected absence pursuant to federal, local, or state law” as one such protected activity. Legally protected absences are provided by a host of federal, state and local laws, including, but not limited to, the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, the New York Paid Family Leave law, the New York Paid Sick Leave law and New York City Earned Safe and Sick Time Act. The amendment further provides that when an employee is absent for one of these legally protected reasons, employers are prohibited from “assessing any demerit, occurrence, any other point, or deductions from an allotted bank of time, which subjects or could subject an employee to disciplinary action, which may include but not be limited to failure to receive a promotion or loss of pay.” Notably, loss of pay and failure to receive a promotion are mentioned as examples of disciplinary action that could be deemed retaliatory.
The amendment targets widely used “no fault” or points-based attendance policies that have come under recent scrutiny. Under such policies, employers assign points or demerits against an employee’s attendance record for absences, often without regard to the reason. Employees who accumulate a certain amount of points or demerits are often penalized, up to and including termination. While these policies provide exemptions for legally protected absences, many businesses are accused of not making workers’ rights clear at the outset, leading them to believe that they will still be penalized for taking legally protected leave.
The new law becomes effective on February 19, 2023. New York employers would be wise to review their absence policies beforehand to ensure that they include—and actually honor—exceptions for legally protected absences. Failure to do so could lead to significant civil penalties and damages.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.comor 216.363.4676.
Adam Primm at aprimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Christopher W. Pendleton at cpendleton@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6219.
Latest News
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.